Duluth Trading Co. Fire Hose Work Pants Review

by Andy Chen on October 11, 2012 · 16 comments

in Gear, Outdoor Gear, Reviews

Pants?  On a gadget review site?  Well, how else are you going to carry all your toys?  Today let’s look at a pair of tricky trousers, the Fire Hose Work Pants from the Duluth Trading Co.

A little background:  I wear “cargo” or “tactical” style pants every day.  I’m currently a Fire Prevention Officer and EMT, but I first got introduced to Royal Robbins pocketed pants when I was with the FBI.  A company called 5.11 Tactical out of Modesto, CA now carries the pants pattern. If Steve Jobs had a closet of jeans and black turtlenecks, then mine is full of 5.11 pants.  To get me to try something else is a big stretch.  Will these oddly-named Fire Hose Work Pants win me over?

  • Tough yet soft 11.5-oz. Fire Hose cotton canvas
  • Prewashed for broken-in comfort
  • Treated for stain and water resistance
  • Comfortable crotch gusset lets you bend and crouch
  • Mid-leg and back pockets with exclusive tuckable capability
  • Deep 8-oz. Fire Hose pocket bags resist punctures from tools
  • Durable triple-stitched seams
  • Imported

Yes, fire hose cotton canvas.  This stuff is thick and durable.  Even at a distance, you can tell this is different.  It’s got a nice feel to it.

Let’s take a closer look at the pants themselves.  At first, they just look like an ordinary pair of “cargo pants.”

The main attraction:  The side pockets!  These are identical on both sides.  There are three pockets.  The smallest one is open to the outside at all times and large enough for most smartphones.  The new iPhone 5 (shown) will peek out slightly.  And no I would never carry my phone in this pocket.  I’d be afraid of losing it.

Small pocket measures about 5″ tall.

The medium sized pocket (under flap) measures under 7″; the largest pocket a little over  8″.

A folding knife fits nicely in the smaller pouch.

The pocket flaps are held down by hook and loop tape.  If you don’t want the flaps, you can tuck them inside where they’re held down by a matching set of hook and loop tape.

Flap tucked in.

There are two rear pockets with flaps.  The flaps on the right are tucked in to show the difference.

I did notice one defect:  One of the hook and loop fasteners were missing (left).

I was surprised to notice that the inside waist liner was nicely appointed with a pleasant contrasting color.

And what’s this?  On the inside left leg at the waist, there’s a hidden pocket that closes with hook and loop fastener.  The iPhone 5 is peeking out for size reference.  (No, I’m not sure I’d carry my phone in there unless I had to.)

And now a quick side by side shot of the popular 5.11 Tactical pants (Tac Lite Pro, left) and the Fire Hose Work Pants (right).

You’ll notice the main side cargo pockets are mounted at different heights.  They’re slightly lower on the 5.11 Tactical pants.

Full side view.  The 5.11 Tactical feature rear “slit” pockets.  The Duluth pants have more traditional jean-style pockets with a flap that can be tucked in.  Notice the elastic waistband on the 5.11 pants.  The Duluth pair are fixed width.

Another view of the cargo pockets.  The 5.11 Tactical pants feature a single upper thigh “magazine” pouch, but the Duluth pants have one small open pouch and two larger pouches under the flap.

The photos don’t show it, but the Duluth Trading Co. Fire Hose Work pants are much, much heavier at 11.5 oz fabric.  The 5.11 Tactical cotton pants weigh in at 8.5 oz fabric, and the Tac-Lite Pro pants (pictured on left) are an even lighter 65% polyester and 35% poly cotton ripstop blend.

The Duluth Trading Co. Fire Hose Work pants feel as extremely comfortable as they are practical.  The 11.5 oz fabric will hold up to quite a bit.  If you prefer something lighter, this may not be for you.

They have them for Women too!

-Julie Strietelmeier

I wanted to jump in here and let you know that Duluth offers women’s pants too. They sent me their Flex Fire Hose Cargo Pants ($64.50 (2+ $59.50 ea)) and their Flex Fire Hose Utility Pants ($59.50 (2+ $54.50 ea)). I love love love the Cargo pants. They are soft and comfortable and fit very well. I hate pants that are really snug in the thighs. These pants aren’t that way. They feel so good that I could sleep in the cargo pants… ok not really, but they are soft and not overly thick. The material feels a little lighter weight than most jeans. The waist band sits below the belly button, so you don’t have to worry that they will look like mom jeans ;) The front pockets are deep and roomy and the cargo pockets on the legs offer hidden dividers for a total of 9 pockets. The Utility pants are nice too, but the fit is a little too big for me, so by the middle of the day they were feeling a little loose and baggy. I may try washing them in hot water to shrink them a big. The Cargo pants feel perfect every time I put them on. I’ll be ordering more.

Product Information

Price:$64.50 (regular), $69.50 (big/tall)
Manufacturer:Duluth Trading Co.
Pros:
  • Heavy duty fabric
  • Lots of pockets, can go with or without flaps.
  • Hidden inside pocket is a plus.
  • Comes in 8 colors.
Cons:
  • Feels heavier than your average jeans, if you prefer something lighter.
Send to Kindle

{ 16 comments… read them below or add one }

1 marcus October 14, 2012 at 1:34 am

I have me one of these great pants but need to be broken in. for me, the pants do tend to chafe and do get warm after wearing it a bit. (i stay in an equatorial climate)
but all in all they are tough, strong, and got tons of carrying space. i do feel that the back pocket is not very condusive for keeping the wallet tho. with this i keep it in my sidepocket.

2 Julie October 17, 2012 at 12:50 pm

FYI: I just added some info about their women’s pants to the bottom of Andy’s review.

3 Charles Austin December 18, 2012 at 11:03 am

Just to keep the review updated, Duluth Trading also has STRETCH fire hose pants for added flexibility.

4 Julie December 18, 2012 at 11:11 am

@Charles I’m still loving the women’s pants. They have a little stretch to them. I bought 2 more pairs and wear them every day.

5 Trudy December 18, 2012 at 11:40 am

Julie, did they shrink at all? even a little bit? Thanks!

6 Julie December 18, 2012 at 11:42 am

@Trudy I don’t think so. If they did it was so little that it’s not noticeable. I did notice that the material used on the newer ones I purchased aren’t as soft/brushed as the original sample pair they sent me. That’s not to say the new ones are worse. Just a little bit different.

7 Trudy December 18, 2012 at 1:17 pm

Thanks, Julie! I ordered the lined fire hose pants, it’s a “trim” cut rather than the full cut of the women’s fire hose work pants. If you’d like, I will fill you on on my impressions.

8 Julie December 18, 2012 at 2:49 pm

@Trudy Yes please do!

9 Michael December 27, 2012 at 3:53 pm

How wide are each of the 3 individual pockets on the cargo pockets?

10 Andy Chen December 27, 2012 at 7:37 pm

7.5″ wide (largest)
3.5″ wide (smaller one, taller)
3″ wide (shortest exterior pouch w/o flap)

11 Dave January 10, 2013 at 4:53 pm

Confirm the free shipping promo-codes with a live representative!?

Twice I typed and applied the code on separate orders, received order conformation on the amount I agreed to pay, and twice my Visa was overcharged just before the orders shipped. Customer service attempted to convince me that I had blundered when finalizing the order – not true – I had the final conformation invoice on file a day before the overcharge was ever applied.

DTC did credit my account, but funds are never returned so quickly as they are extracted and had I only enough money in checking to cover the agreed upon “confirmed” price; I would have been fined $35.00 dollars for insufficient funds from US Bank. This penalty fee is not compensated for in the DTC “No Hassle No Bull” guarantee.

12 Matt March 14, 2013 at 1:07 pm

What color pants are you using in the review?

THANKS!

13 Andy Chen March 14, 2013 at 1:09 pm

I believe it is Desert Khaki.

14 Dave May 6, 2013 at 3:01 pm

The tuck-in pocket flaps are a good design: What working man really want to fuss with flaps all day, I leave them tucked full time.

The pockets are too deep: I need to bend at the waist to get anything near the bottom; after 25 years of shoeing horses for wages I do not care to bend more than what is absolutely necessary.

The front pockets that traditionally hold keys and change have a smaller pocket inside the right front pocket that traps whatever is in there and often makes it a two handed operation to extract the contents.

The security pocket on the inside of the left front is brilliant and big enough for a credit card and wad of cash.

Water bounced off these pants up until the first and only washing with cool water and a small amount of detergent – tumble dry low heat, now they repel water at about 30% efficacy

15 Trudy May 6, 2013 at 3:14 pm

Hi Julie,

I purchased both the women’s lined pants and the firehose, unlined. The lined pants have a slimmer fit and are tighter in the hips. With my build, this caused a mild (very mild) pinching and I prefer the fit of the firehose pants.

The lined pants (brown color) have stood up to pretty rough treatment this winter, including a few nasty falls on ice when animal training without so much as a rip, tear or abrading on the fabric. The lining is fleece so it feels soft against the skin and kept my legs toasty. I wore these very often! The pockets are not as deep as the firehose women’s, but deep enough for my purposes. Overall, I am happy with the quality of these pants. I do wish that there was a touch more room in the hips.

The firehose had more room in the hips and I could wear thermals underneath during the winter. I have worn them in the spring weather. The pockets are deep and I like the choice of closing the cargo pockets or keeping them open. These pants are rugged and built to last! I have worn them a number of times and they have not shown a hint of fading (brown and dark blue). The legs are nice and wide without being too wide, good to go over my workboots.

The duluth pants fit me much better than the women’s carhartt’s I had been using and are more comfortable to work in.

16 Julie May 6, 2013 at 3:28 pm

@Trudy I have a pair of the firehose cargo’s on right now. I ended up ordering 3 pairs after getting that first pair to review. :)

Leave a Comment

Customize your avatar by using gravatar.

By submitting a comment here you agree to our comment policy and grant this site your explicit permission to reproduce your words, name, company and web site.


Previous post:

Next post: