NEWS – TL;DR: Enjoy premium listening at a best-on-the-web price with these Painless Ear Clip Sport Wireless Bluetooth 5.0 Earbuds with charging case, now only $23.99.
How long does it take before wearing earbuds stops being fun and becomes an annoyance? A couple of hours? Just an hour? With most earbuds, it often doesn’t take much for wearers to start feeling fatigued with uncomfortable, awkward buds dangling out of their ears.
Sometimes, they’re poorly designed. Other times, they’re cheaply constructed. Either way, for those who plan to spend considerable time with earbuds notched securely in place (read: most of us), getting a pair that combines premiere sound quality with a streamlined, comfortable fit are worth their weight in gold.
These Painless Ear Clip Sport Wireless Bluetooth, 5.0 Earbuds from Tech Essential, get that.
At first glance, it’s hard not to be intrigued by these buds’ unconventional, ergonomic design. The pair clip seamlessly to your ear, painlessly yet securely delivering maximum audio fidelity with low latency and a stable transmission. Of course, don’t let the lack of ear enclosures or even wraparound hooks fool you — these earbuds serve up crystal clear surround-sound-worthy audio, all without feeling like you’re lugging bowling balls off of your earlobes.
With full Bluetooth 5.0 connectivity and built-in audio enhancements like inspired binaural separation to switch between left and right earbuds, users get a stable, powerful, lightweight connection that always makes listening a pleasure.
Along with deep satisfying bass accompanying sublime mids and highs, these buds also come with an ultra-handy 2200mAh charging case. With that power backup, listeners can expect life for up to 120 hours in standby mode. And you can also use the charging case for other practical needs, like charging your smartphone.
The painless Ear Clip Sport Wireless Bluetooth 5.0 Earbuds are enjoying a stellar sale price of just $23.99 (reg. $35), the best price available right now on the web.
Prices subject to change.
Gadgeteer Comment Policy - Please read before commenting
This review is nothing but a regurgitation oof what the website states. Like her last review of earbuds no specs on frequency response which is a true measure of sound quality. These like the last are from stacksocial and come to you via a slow boat from China. Buyer beware. They may be comfortable but “crystal clear hi fidelity sound” is doubtful, that quote by the reviewer is straight from the product description on stacksocial. I would prefer an evaluation in the reviewers own words. You get what you pay for folks. I remember the day when this website did honest quality reviews. Some reviewers may still but this reviewer is developing a track record, at least with earbuds.
This was not a review. It was a deal/news post. Reviews have the word REVIEW in the title and are the first word in the actual article.
I’m glad to see that you stood up and set Disappointed straight. It’s pretty clear on your site what are reviews and what are posted deal.
I appreciate your site and all of your contributors.
I have to say i agree with PC I thought the purpose of this website was to do product reviews. I have been reading your site for years and quite frankly did not pick up on the change to news or deals verses a review. To quote your website about description “ The Gadgeteer grew to become one of the most trusted product review sites on the net. Recognized by Microsoft, the Wallstreet Journal and many other industry sources as the site to go to for real hands-on reviews without the fluff…”
I honestly still thought all the articles were reviews and did not pick up on the change from the original site purpose. I will pay closer attention to the headings.
If you’ve been reading the site for years, then you haven’t been paying attention 😉 Since the Gadgeteer started almost 26yrs ago, it’s always been a mixture of reviews and news with some deal posts thrown in to the mix. Since the start, every review has the word REVIEW in the title and as of 5-6 years ago or so, I started adding the word REVIEW, NEWS, or ARTICLE to the beginning of each published post because sometimes people can’t understand that a 100 word news post is not a review. Our reviews are long form articles where we talk about our experience using a product along with a lot of photos, pros, cons, etc. News posts are typically 1-2 photos and a short paragraph introducing some interesting product that we came across and wanted to share with readers and where to buy it/them if interested. Hope this helps!
That’s so backwards. The paid promotions are the posts that should be clearly marked rather than reviews being marked. I thought this was a review as well.
This used to be a review site, meaning reviews were the norm. If reviews need to be marked as such, that means that reviews are now the exception.