Stauer 1930 Dashtronic Watch

The Stauer 1930 Dashtronic Watch has a look inspired by the machine-age designs of the 1930s.  Everything – from cars to toasters – had a sleek, streamlined look then.  Even watches were influenced by the industrial designers of the period, and a new watch complication was introduced.  Instead of hands, time was displayed by a “jumping mechanism,” which displayed numerals on a dial and looked like a speedometer in a car.  This 1930 Dashtronic watch doesn’t use a real jumping mechanism, but it does look like those watches.  It has 21 jewels and is water-resistant to 3-ATM.  It has a stainless steel case and a black aligator-embossed leather band.  This is an automatic watch, meaning no winding and no batteries are needed.  It has a mineral crystal over the time dial and a clear back so you can see the watch works as they … work.  The watch case is 1.5″, and the band is 9.5″ long and fits a 7-8.5″ wrist.  The limited-edition Stauer 1930 Dashtronic Watch sells for $99.00.

Support The Gadgeteer: The Gadgeteer’s main sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links in articles like this one. Even though we may receive compensation, we always give our honest opinions about our experiences with each product.

10 thoughts on “Stauer 1930 Dashtronic Watch”




  1. Gadgeteer Comment Policy - Please read before commenting
  2. Janet Cloninger

    Yeah, Bob. I believe it’s saying it’s time to check the time on your cell phone. 😉 I can’t tell, but maybe it’s because the angle doesn’t let you see little markers that would help.

  3. It’s a cool looking watch Janet, but to me I’d want something with hands or digital readout so I can just glance at it and know the time. I thought the binary watch was cool too when it first came out but I’d spend more time trying to figure that one out 🙂

  4. Janet Cloninger

    Bob, I went to the Stauer website and saw that they had that same watch in a gold-tone. They had taken the picture at a different angle, and that one definitely had a black line over the dials that marked the numbers. I could clearly see what was being marked, but I still had to count the little lines between the numbers to know what time it was.

    I know what you mean about being able to just glance and know the time just by the angle of the hands. I’ve just always had a thing for unusual watches. I thought this one looked great, but I know I’d probably have to treat it more as a bracelet and sneak a look at the cell phone for the time – at least until I got used to it. Somebody like my daughter would probably get used to it faster than I could. She’s so young that she’s seen mostly digital clocks in her life. She’s actually had to ask me what the time was when all she could see was an “old-fashioned” clock. She never got used to telling time the way we do, anyway. 🙂

    Oh, and the watch in the picture says it’s 2:02!

  5. I liked this watch so much from a Natural geographic magazine that I looked it up online . I think it is amazing . I have to say I’ve never had much luck with watches . I am a total cell phone time checker ever since I got my cell phone. I personally can read any clock and I agree Bob that it would take a bit to get used to but I think it’d be nice . I’m not a fan of the clear back however ,I like my belongings sturdy . A clear back wont hold up well to abuse in my case.

  6. @Amanda My favorite watch is my self winding Seiko Scuba Diver’s watch that I got many many years ago when I use to dive, and is/has to be very rugged- down to 200 Meters- not that I’d go down that far 🙂

Leave a Reply to Bob Deloyd Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *