<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keep your data safe with a Data Locker drive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/09/07/keep-your-data-safe-with-a-data-locker-drive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/09/07/keep-your-data-safe-with-a-data-locker-drive/</link>
	<description>Gadget reviews and news by Julie Strietelmeier and friends since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/09/07/keep-your-data-safe-with-a-data-locker-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-42909</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-gadgeteer.com/?p=21386#comment-42909</guid>
		<description>These drive+keypad things are a good idea, in theory, because they protect you from keyboard sniffing. In practice, though, they&#039;re not very secure.

Even if you could remember a random 18-digit numeric password (which you can&#039;t), it would only offer 54 bits of security, best-case, so the whole 128/256-bit AES thing is marketing nonsense.

Lenovo makes a similar model, which, unfortunately, I own. I took it apart. Based on the chips on the circuit board, it looks like they store the AES key (which may or may not be encrypted) in a non-volatile memory chip on the circuit board. The kind of chip you can de-solder and read.

Before I bought the Lenovo, I emailed the Data Locker people. As I recall, it&#039;s implemented the same way.

Probably better to use TrueCrypt (truecrypt.org) for free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These drive+keypad things are a good idea, in theory, because they protect you from keyboard sniffing. In practice, though, they&#8217;re not very secure.</p>
<p>Even if you could remember a random 18-digit numeric password (which you can&#8217;t), it would only offer 54 bits of security, best-case, so the whole 128/256-bit AES thing is marketing nonsense.</p>
<p>Lenovo makes a similar model, which, unfortunately, I own. I took it apart. Based on the chips on the circuit board, it looks like they store the AES key (which may or may not be encrypted) in a non-volatile memory chip on the circuit board. The kind of chip you can de-solder and read.</p>
<p>Before I bought the Lenovo, I emailed the Data Locker people. As I recall, it&#8217;s implemented the same way.</p>
<p>Probably better to use TrueCrypt (truecrypt.org) for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

