<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zoom audio quality + video = Q3 Handy Video Recorder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/07/20/zoom-audio-quality-video-q3-handy-video-recorder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/07/20/zoom-audio-quality-video-q3-handy-video-recorder/</link>
	<description>Gadget reviews and news by Julie Strietelmeier and friends since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnthonyZmonti</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/07/20/zoom-audio-quality-video-q3-handy-video-recorder/comment-page-1/#comment-39406</link>
		<dc:creator>AnthonyZmonti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-gadgeteer.com/?p=17968#comment-39406</guid>
		<description>Is this the same ZOOM that has been making guitar electronics for the last 20?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the same ZOOM that has been making guitar electronics for the last 20?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dumeril Seven</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/07/20/zoom-audio-quality-video-q3-handy-video-recorder/comment-page-1/#comment-39401</link>
		<dc:creator>Dumeril Seven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-gadgeteer.com/?p=17968#comment-39401</guid>
		<description>I think the big deal is that Q3 has decent audio (full 44.1/48kHz PCM stereo WAV with no lossy compression; plus a decent quality stereo mic).  All of the current inexpensive mini camcorders have pretty miserable, low-fidelity, mono audio.  OTOH, great audio without HD is kind of putting lipstick on a pig.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the big deal is that Q3 has decent audio (full 44.1/48kHz PCM stereo WAV with no lossy compression; plus a decent quality stereo mic).  All of the current inexpensive mini camcorders have pretty miserable, low-fidelity, mono audio.  OTOH, great audio without HD is kind of putting lipstick on a pig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

