<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Imagelab Slide &amp; Negative Scanner Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/05/28/imagelab-slide-negative-scanner-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/05/28/imagelab-slide-negative-scanner-review/</link>
	<description>Gadget reviews and news by Julie Strietelmeier and friends since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:27:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Dillahunty</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/05/28/imagelab-slide-negative-scanner-review/comment-page-1/#comment-36619</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Dillahunty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 14:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-gadgeteer.com/?p=15481#comment-36619</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used ScanCafe a little, and have a co-worker who has done some huge number (like 15,000) scans with them. Good service, although a little slow.

They do have the added benefit that you only have to choose 50% (or more) of the slides to &quot;keep&quot;... that helps solve part of the problem with not wanting all the scans.

Worth checking out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used ScanCafe a little, and have a co-worker who has done some huge number (like 15,000) scans with them. Good service, although a little slow.</p>
<p>They do have the added benefit that you only have to choose 50% (or more) of the slides to &#8220;keep&#8221;&#8230; that helps solve part of the problem with not wanting all the scans.</p>
<p>Worth checking out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/05/28/imagelab-slide-negative-scanner-review/comment-page-1/#comment-36422</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 03:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-gadgeteer.com/?p=15481#comment-36422</guid>
		<description>&gt;Lisa,

Thanks for the tips.  I&#039;ll give them a try.

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Lisa,</p>
<p>Thanks for the tips.  I&#8217;ll give them a try.</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/05/28/imagelab-slide-negative-scanner-review/comment-page-1/#comment-36342</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-gadgeteer.com/?p=15481#comment-36342</guid>
		<description>I have some of those larger slides too.  So far I&#039;ve been unable to find a home solution, but I did stumble across a company called Scancafe.com.  

From their FAQ:

&quot;Q63: Do you scan medium format slides?
 
Yes. We scan 120/220 medium format slides. We also scan 35mm, 110, 126, 127 slides.&quot;

I have not used them, but if you give them a try, I&#039;d be interested in the results :-)

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some of those larger slides too.  So far I&#8217;ve been unable to find a home solution, but I did stumble across a company called Scancafe.com.  </p>
<p>From their FAQ:</p>
<p>&#8220;Q63: Do you scan medium format slides?</p>
<p>Yes. We scan 120/220 medium format slides. We also scan 35mm, 110, 126, 127 slides.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have not used them, but if you give them a try, I&#8217;d be interested in the results <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/05/28/imagelab-slide-negative-scanner-review/comment-page-1/#comment-36340</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-gadgeteer.com/?p=15481#comment-36340</guid>
		<description>Hi, it looks like that scanner did an okay job, which is cool.  I noticed a few hangups that you had, and I can give you a couple recommendations.  I have been doing slide scanning as a business for several years, and after a lot of trial and error, I have decided to share my knowledge on a new website.  So, for example, to clean the slides, get a scratchproof cloth made specifically for cleaning eyeglasses.  Use this to wipe off each slide just before scanning.  It seems to work pretty good for lint.  Also, I noticed that fingerprints rarely show up.  They usually only show up if they have been on the slide for years and years, and the oil has burned a fingerprint likeness into the image.  Also, for glass slides, there is a slide to digital technique where you lay your slide down on a lightboard, or even held up to a sunlit window, and take a photograph of it with a digital camera.  This works surprisingly well.  I will be outlining the technique on my website pretty soon.  I hope this helps you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, it looks like that scanner did an okay job, which is cool.  I noticed a few hangups that you had, and I can give you a couple recommendations.  I have been doing slide scanning as a business for several years, and after a lot of trial and error, I have decided to share my knowledge on a new website.  So, for example, to clean the slides, get a scratchproof cloth made specifically for cleaning eyeglasses.  Use this to wipe off each slide just before scanning.  It seems to work pretty good for lint.  Also, I noticed that fingerprints rarely show up.  They usually only show up if they have been on the slide for years and years, and the oil has burned a fingerprint likeness into the image.  Also, for glass slides, there is a slide to digital technique where you lay your slide down on a lightboard, or even held up to a sunlit window, and take a photograph of it with a digital camera.  This works surprisingly well.  I will be outlining the technique on my website pretty soon.  I hope this helps you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j3ff</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/05/28/imagelab-slide-negative-scanner-review/comment-page-1/#comment-36332</link>
		<dc:creator>j3ff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-gadgeteer.com/?p=15481#comment-36332</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m finding that most scanners out there have the limitation &quot;The trays are only for cardboard mount 35mm slides.&quot; I have a ton of slides that my Dad took during my and my sister&#039;s childhood that I&#039;d love to scan in. My Cannon all-in-one will scan negatives and slides, but has the same limitation. The slides I have are the same outside dimension of the mount, but the transparency inside is much bigger than a 35mm, and it&#039;s square. Don&#039;t know what that&#039;s called. I&#039;d love to find something to scan these that didn&#039;t cost an arm and a leg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m finding that most scanners out there have the limitation &#8220;The trays are only for cardboard mount 35mm slides.&#8221; I have a ton of slides that my Dad took during my and my sister&#8217;s childhood that I&#8217;d love to scan in. My Cannon all-in-one will scan negatives and slides, but has the same limitation. The slides I have are the same outside dimension of the mount, but the transparency inside is much bigger than a 35mm, and it&#8217;s square. Don&#8217;t know what that&#8217;s called. I&#8217;d love to find something to scan these that didn&#8217;t cost an arm and a leg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
