<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spotlight Gadget &#8211; LifeSpan MyBeat Heart Rate Ring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/02/07/spotlight-gadget-lifespan-mybeat-heart-rate-ring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/02/07/spotlight-gadget-lifespan-mybeat-heart-rate-ring/</link>
	<description>Gadget reviews and news by Julie Strietelmeier and friends since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:50:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/02/07/spotlight-gadget-lifespan-mybeat-heart-rate-ring/comment-page-1/#comment-56073</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-gadgeteer.com/?p=12256#comment-56073</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a long distance runner. I&#039;ve owned several chest strap models, all much more expensive than the heart rate ring. I&#039;ve also had two Garmin Forerunners, (one a replacement), and although both were spot on for the GPS-related functions, NEITHER could provide a dependable pulse reading. The ring can, IF you are patient and give it 30 seconds to a minute to fully engage. I&#039;ve matched its output with three Polar models as well as a Timex, and all fall within a range of about 3-5 beats per minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a long distance runner. I&#8217;ve owned several chest strap models, all much more expensive than the heart rate ring. I&#8217;ve also had two Garmin Forerunners, (one a replacement), and although both were spot on for the GPS-related functions, NEITHER could provide a dependable pulse reading. The ring can, IF you are patient and give it 30 seconds to a minute to fully engage. I&#8217;ve matched its output with three Polar models as well as a Timex, and all fall within a range of about 3-5 beats per minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carly</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/02/07/spotlight-gadget-lifespan-mybeat-heart-rate-ring/comment-page-1/#comment-30276</link>
		<dc:creator>Carly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 01:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-gadgeteer.com/?p=12256#comment-30276</guid>
		<description>Too bad this doesnt sound terribly accurate. I am thinking about trying a garmin forerunner 50 with foot pod and heart rate strap...I am just curious what my actual exertion is when I run, and the treadmills at the gym are wildly inaccurate. Once it had my heart rate go from 170--&gt;70--&gt;165 in the span of a minute!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad this doesnt sound terribly accurate. I am thinking about trying a garmin forerunner 50 with foot pod and heart rate strap&#8230;I am just curious what my actual exertion is when I run, and the treadmills at the gym are wildly inaccurate. Once it had my heart rate go from 170&#8211;&gt;70&#8211;&gt;165 in the span of a minute!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/02/07/spotlight-gadget-lifespan-mybeat-heart-rate-ring/comment-page-1/#comment-30271</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-gadgeteer.com/?p=12256#comment-30271</guid>
		<description>@Ronald: My treadmill has a thumb &#039;reader&#039; thing that you&#039;re supposed to press your thumb on to read your heart rate. It doesn&#039;t work either. From the sound of it, it seems like the heart rate straps might be the best method... I&#039;ve not tried one of those in a long time though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ronald: My treadmill has a thumb &#8216;reader&#8217; thing that you&#8217;re supposed to press your thumb on to read your heart rate. It doesn&#8217;t work either. From the sound of it, it seems like the heart rate straps might be the best method&#8230; I&#8217;ve not tried one of those in a long time though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/02/07/spotlight-gadget-lifespan-mybeat-heart-rate-ring/comment-page-1/#comment-30269</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-gadgeteer.com/?p=12256#comment-30269</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to have a good heart rate without the trouble of using a (sweaty) chest band.
Sorry to hear they&#039;re so inaccurate.

At my gym they&#039;ve got these hand grips which tell you (should tell you) your heart beat ... they&#039;re way off too allas (... unless I&#039;m is such a good shape that I could run 10 km/hr with a heart beat of 60 strokes/minute ... ;-)

I&#039;d be interested if you could get a hand on one and test it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to have a good heart rate without the trouble of using a (sweaty) chest band.<br />
Sorry to hear they&#8217;re so inaccurate.</p>
<p>At my gym they&#8217;ve got these hand grips which tell you (should tell you) your heart beat &#8230; they&#8217;re way off too allas (&#8230; unless I&#8217;m is such a good shape that I could run 10 km/hr with a heart beat of 60 strokes/minute &#8230; <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested if you could get a hand on one and test it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/02/07/spotlight-gadget-lifespan-mybeat-heart-rate-ring/comment-page-1/#comment-30264</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-gadgeteer.com/?p=12256#comment-30264</guid>
		<description>@Jackie: Well that is disappointing! Thanks for the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jackie: Well that is disappointing! Thanks for the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/02/07/spotlight-gadget-lifespan-mybeat-heart-rate-ring/comment-page-1/#comment-30258</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-gadgeteer.com/?p=12256#comment-30258</guid>
		<description>They sell those at Brookstone stores.  I tried a few of them out since they had a few samples on the shelves.  The problem with them is that all of them gave different results that were way off.  I even tried one on my left and right fingers at the same time and somehow I have 2 different heart rates with one being double the other.  It is a nice concept if they could make it more accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They sell those at Brookstone stores.  I tried a few of them out since they had a few samples on the shelves.  The problem with them is that all of them gave different results that were way off.  I even tried one on my left and right fingers at the same time and somehow I have 2 different heart rates with one being double the other.  It is a nice concept if they could make it more accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

