<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palm Treo Pro Smartphone Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/</link>
	<description>Gadget reviews and news by Julie Strietelmeier and friends since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:50:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-56949</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-56949</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this review! I have the 800w right now and I&#039;m on the FOURTH...yes, that&#039;s right 4th one. They are upgrading me to the Pro and I&#039;ve already decided if this one goes wonky on me like the 800w has I&#039;m gonna scream!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this review! I have the 800w right now and I&#8217;m on the FOURTH&#8230;yes, that&#8217;s right 4th one. They are upgrading me to the Pro and I&#8217;ve already decided if this one goes wonky on me like the 800w has I&#8217;m gonna scream!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gannzter</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-52092</link>
		<dc:creator>Gannzter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-52092</guid>
		<description>Sounds to me like the Palm Treo pro is from this review &amp; a few others, something of the under dog. Even Microsoft&#039;s WM is not getting much love.

I like going with the under dogs, so even with the &quot;under whelming&quot; verdict for the Palm Treo Pro, I&#039;m not too unhappy that I asked Santa for one &amp; it is currently in the mail from the Dell store. I am currently using the WM6 on the Motorola Q9h &amp; a major feature I&#039;ve missed on a not so bad OS is the lack of a touch screen, which I had gotten used to from the Palm Treo 680.

The Treo can&#039;t be that bad, palm listened &amp; gave us an unlocked phone with WiFi along with a standard 3.5mm audio jack, which makes me happy. I&#039;m also looking forward to the seemless synchronization with my MS Outlook 03/07.

I am slightly perturbed with the cheap looking centro type keyboard compares to the one my Q, but then again the phone does have a touch screen with a stylus. 

Let&#039;s go Palm 
Let&#039;s Go!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds to me like the Palm Treo pro is from this review &amp; a few others, something of the under dog. Even Microsoft&#8217;s WM is not getting much love.</p>
<p>I like going with the under dogs, so even with the &#8220;under whelming&#8221; verdict for the Palm Treo Pro, I&#8217;m not too unhappy that I asked Santa for one &amp; it is currently in the mail from the Dell store. I am currently using the WM6 on the Motorola Q9h &amp; a major feature I&#8217;ve missed on a not so bad OS is the lack of a touch screen, which I had gotten used to from the Palm Treo 680.</p>
<p>The Treo can&#8217;t be that bad, palm listened &amp; gave us an unlocked phone with WiFi along with a standard 3.5mm audio jack, which makes me happy. I&#8217;m also looking forward to the seemless synchronization with my MS Outlook 03/07.</p>
<p>I am slightly perturbed with the cheap looking centro type keyboard compares to the one my Q, but then again the phone does have a touch screen with a stylus. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s go Palm<br />
Let&#8217;s Go!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: May C</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25308</link>
		<dc:creator>May C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25308</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m trying out the E71 and I agree with Keyser Soze that the phone is amazingly slim (probably too slim for me since I&#039;m so used to the Treo thickness).  I keep forgetting that it&#039;s non touchscreen and always going for the stylus.  My main problem is with the keyboard.  I only wished the keys were more spaced out since I have problems typing on it with my fingers like I do without problems on my Treo 750 and 650.  With fingernails, it&#039;s much easier but I don&#039;t like doing it that way.  And the camera flash plus all the host of other stuff like business and personal mode really make me reconsider this as my next device instead of a Palm branded device whether it be WM or Palm OS or Nova.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wasn&#039;t blown away by it at first, but I&#039;m starting to really like it now.  S60 seems to be confusing to navigate at first but I&#039;m getting the hang of it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying out the E71 and I agree with Keyser Soze that the phone is amazingly slim (probably too slim for me since I&#8217;m so used to the Treo thickness).  I keep forgetting that it&#8217;s non touchscreen and always going for the stylus.  My main problem is with the keyboard.  I only wished the keys were more spaced out since I have problems typing on it with my fingers like I do without problems on my Treo 750 and 650.  With fingernails, it&#8217;s much easier but I don&#8217;t like doing it that way.  And the camera flash plus all the host of other stuff like business and personal mode really make me reconsider this as my next device instead of a Palm branded device whether it be WM or Palm OS or Nova.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t blown away by it at first, but I&#8217;m starting to really like it now.  S60 seems to be confusing to navigate at first but I&#8217;m getting the hang of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keyser Soze</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25307</link>
		<dc:creator>Keyser Soze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25307</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been using my new smartphone, a Nokia E71-2 for over 2 weeks now.  No touchscreen on the phone, but there is a full qwerty keyboard.  Most programs fire up instantly; I use it mainly for email and sms.  I think its worth a look.  Don&#039;t be fooled by the pictures on the Internet.  The device is very sleek and pocketable in real life.  Its actually slightly slimmer and thinner than the iPhone 3G.  The battery life is amazing as well - it uses 1500 mAh battery.  It&#039;s available in either grey or white.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The best part of the qwerty keyboard is that I don&#039;t have to deal with T9 anymore and Nokia has included text auto-correction for those of us with big fingers.  I&#039;ve never used an iPhone - but I&#039;m guessing it functions similarly to the iPhone&#039;s self correcting feature for the on-screen keyboard.  (Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, or so they say...)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I use the phone with my Vista Laptop and it works perfectly - I&#039;m not so sure about Mac OS.  I just checked and there is a version of Missing Sync for Symbian, but I have no idea how good the software actually is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s available online everywhere, but the best prices seem to be available through Amazon, Newegg or Buy.com for around $320-390 USD  (Amazon had a gold box special last week for $320)  (I live in Canada, so can&#039;t order at these prices...)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using my new smartphone, a Nokia E71-2 for over 2 weeks now.  No touchscreen on the phone, but there is a full qwerty keyboard.  Most programs fire up instantly; I use it mainly for email and sms.  I think its worth a look.  Don&#8217;t be fooled by the pictures on the Internet.  The device is very sleek and pocketable in real life.  Its actually slightly slimmer and thinner than the iPhone 3G.  The battery life is amazing as well &#8211; it uses 1500 mAh battery.  It&#8217;s available in either grey or white.</p>
<p>The best part of the qwerty keyboard is that I don&#8217;t have to deal with T9 anymore and Nokia has included text auto-correction for those of us with big fingers.  I&#8217;ve never used an iPhone &#8211; but I&#8217;m guessing it functions similarly to the iPhone&#8217;s self correcting feature for the on-screen keyboard.  (Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, or so they say&#8230;)</p>
<p>I use the phone with my Vista Laptop and it works perfectly &#8211; I&#8217;m not so sure about Mac OS.  I just checked and there is a version of Missing Sync for Symbian, but I have no idea how good the software actually is.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s available online everywhere, but the best prices seem to be available through Amazon, Newegg or Buy.com for around $320-390 USD  (Amazon had a gold box special last week for $320)  (I live in Canada, so can&#8217;t order at these prices&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BBUsyB</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25306</link>
		<dc:creator>BBUsyB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 07:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25306</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry to hear that you didn&#039;t enjoy you phone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll thought Someone should chime in and defend Windows Mobile a bit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While WM cab a bit underwhelming at times (especially when you compare it to the iPhone) what it does best is offer a more or less consistent experience on a variet of hardware. Sound Familiar?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Seriously, one of the major problems with WM phones has been that the manufacturers have tried to skimp on the costs a bit by using slower processors and less internal memory. That more often then not leads to sluggishness as WM allows Multitasking, allowing you to have multiple programs running at the same time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If the Hardware is decent, it runs quiet well. Another problem that often affects performance is when The company selling it dosen&#039;t customise it to optimise performance, or adds a alot of crap ware (carrier&#039;s I&#039;m looking at you).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What&#039;s there if properly configured is a very powerful system, with a ton of configurable and a very active user &amp; development community (xda-developers).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve personally been using WM phones for years, and while I&#039;ve tried using Palm&#039;s and Blackberry&#039;s , There was nothing there which convinced me to switch over.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the End it does depend very much on the user and the usage scenario. I Enjoy hacking my Phone, and trying new stuff on it all the time. WM&#039;s pretty much met my needs for that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Palm Unfortunately has gotten really long on the tooth, and the OS seems antiquated. I Loved my TX, But that was 4 Years ago.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Blackberry is great if what you mainly want is Great mail access. But I&#039;ve personally never gotten into it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The iPhone looks great and feels great when using it, But I&#039;m leery of stepping inside a closed ecosystem, where I&#039;ll need to void my warranty to put non approved stuff on it. Not to mention the Exclusive contract.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hear that you didn&#8217;t enjoy you phone.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll thought Someone should chime in and defend Windows Mobile a bit.</p>
<p>While WM cab a bit underwhelming at times (especially when you compare it to the iPhone) what it does best is offer a more or less consistent experience on a variet of hardware. Sound Familiar?</p>
<p>Seriously, one of the major problems with WM phones has been that the manufacturers have tried to skimp on the costs a bit by using slower processors and less internal memory. That more often then not leads to sluggishness as WM allows Multitasking, allowing you to have multiple programs running at the same time.</p>
<p>If the Hardware is decent, it runs quiet well. Another problem that often affects performance is when The company selling it dosen&#8217;t customise it to optimise performance, or adds a alot of crap ware (carrier&#8217;s I&#8217;m looking at you).</p>
<p>What&#8217;s there if properly configured is a very powerful system, with a ton of configurable and a very active user &amp; development community (xda-developers).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve personally been using WM phones for years, and while I&#8217;ve tried using Palm&#8217;s and Blackberry&#8217;s , There was nothing there which convinced me to switch over.</p>
<p>In the End it does depend very much on the user and the usage scenario. I Enjoy hacking my Phone, and trying new stuff on it all the time. WM&#8217;s pretty much met my needs for that.</p>
<p>Palm Unfortunately has gotten really long on the tooth, and the OS seems antiquated. I Loved my TX, But that was 4 Years ago.</p>
<p>Blackberry is great if what you mainly want is Great mail access. But I&#8217;ve personally never gotten into it.</p>
<p>The iPhone looks great and feels great when using it, But I&#8217;m leery of stepping inside a closed ecosystem, where I&#8217;ll need to void my warranty to put non approved stuff on it. Not to mention the Exclusive contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris McNeil</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25305</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris McNeil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25305</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi everyone- thought i&#039;d add my two penneth. I still use a Palm TX daily , and the thing that really annoys me is that with decent software upgrades it could still be a great device. Things like updated phone drivers to allow tethering and surfing through a 3G phone, SDHC driver support for big memory cards, a decent web browser, must be almost trivial to provide for palm. Bigger upgrades, such as allowing the Palm OS 5.x to run 3 radios, or a prettier interface must be possible. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My preferred PDA &quot;solution&quot; (sorry) has alway to have a small dumb phone and a PDA, but essentially because my TX will not tether to my newish phone (SE K800i), I am going to have to look elsewhere. I&#039;m not that keen on a centro (although mildly tempted) because of the lack of WIfi and the screen size. I feel that palm have pulled support for their PDAs to get us to buy their smartphones, a real kick in the teeth for people who spent Â£250 on a product only 2 years ago.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh well, I suppose i&#039;ll just add to the sense of melancholy here in this thread, of people who are very affectionate towards Palm, but simply not satisfied by their current situation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;PS on a technical note, does anyone know how easy it is to use a 3G phone as a modem for a standalone Windows Mobile PDA? Probably with WM 5 or 6&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Julie - sorry to use the forum for tech support!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone- thought i&#8217;d add my two penneth. I still use a Palm TX daily , and the thing that really annoys me is that with decent software upgrades it could still be a great device. Things like updated phone drivers to allow tethering and surfing through a 3G phone, SDHC driver support for big memory cards, a decent web browser, must be almost trivial to provide for palm. Bigger upgrades, such as allowing the Palm OS 5.x to run 3 radios, or a prettier interface must be possible. </p>
<p>My preferred PDA &#8220;solution&#8221; (sorry) has alway to have a small dumb phone and a PDA, but essentially because my TX will not tether to my newish phone (SE K800i), I am going to have to look elsewhere. I&#8217;m not that keen on a centro (although mildly tempted) because of the lack of WIfi and the screen size. I feel that palm have pulled support for their PDAs to get us to buy their smartphones, a real kick in the teeth for people who spent Â£250 on a product only 2 years ago.</p>
<p>Oh well, I suppose i&#8217;ll just add to the sense of melancholy here in this thread, of people who are very affectionate towards Palm, but simply not satisfied by their current situation.</p>
<p>PS on a technical note, does anyone know how easy it is to use a 3G phone as a modem for a standalone Windows Mobile PDA? Probably with WM 5 or 6</p>
<p>Julie &#8211; sorry to use the forum for tech support!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: May C</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25304</link>
		<dc:creator>May C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25304</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Way back when Palm first announced their first Windows Mobile Treo, being a Palm OS fan then, I was disappointed but understood that it was necessary for the company to continue.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Please keep in mind that at the time, Microsoft was competing with Palm on the Pocket PC/Windows Mobile side.  Had Palm not agreed to an alliance with Microsoft, it&#039;s very likely that Palm (PalmOne then) would have died a lot quicker (think Netscape).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It turned out to be a blessing in disguise that the deal was made as we can now look back and see how little innovation Palm has made with respect to the OS, hardware, etc.  The Windows Mobile Treo seems to be the main thing that has been keeping them alive for the past 5 years.  Nothing innovative they have come up with in these years have done anything.  LifeDrive, and Foleo with exception of Centro (which is really another Treo in different casing and design) were tossed out just as quickly as they were released.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am doubtful that Nova will really be reality either.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way back when Palm first announced their first Windows Mobile Treo, being a Palm OS fan then, I was disappointed but understood that it was necessary for the company to continue.</p>
<p>Please keep in mind that at the time, Microsoft was competing with Palm on the Pocket PC/Windows Mobile side.  Had Palm not agreed to an alliance with Microsoft, it&#8217;s very likely that Palm (PalmOne then) would have died a lot quicker (think Netscape).</p>
<p>It turned out to be a blessing in disguise that the deal was made as we can now look back and see how little innovation Palm has made with respect to the OS, hardware, etc.  The Windows Mobile Treo seems to be the main thing that has been keeping them alive for the past 5 years.  Nothing innovative they have come up with in these years have done anything.  LifeDrive, and Foleo with exception of Centro (which is really another Treo in different casing and design) were tossed out just as quickly as they were released.</p>
<p>I am doubtful that Nova will really be reality either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25303</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25303</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jake:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes, it was a big deal when Palm decided to produce Windows Mobile phones a few years ago. I agree that it was an odd decision. It would be my guess that Palm OS based Treos outsell Windows Mobile ones. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake:</p>
<p>Yes, it was a big deal when Palm decided to produce Windows Mobile phones a few years ago. I agree that it was an odd decision. It would be my guess that Palm OS based Treos outsell Windows Mobile ones. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Tongue</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25302</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Tongue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25302</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t get why palm runs windows mobile since I think it&#039;s a competitor to their own os. I have just lost intrest in palm since i bought my tungsten t back in 2002:( I think their focusing to much on their treo line. c&#039;mon palm release a smeashing new pda and i might buy it!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get why palm runs windows mobile since I think it&#8217;s a competitor to their own os. I have just lost intrest in palm since i bought my tungsten t back in 2002:( I think their focusing to much on their treo line. c&#8217;mon palm release a smeashing new pda and i might buy it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Adkins</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25301</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Adkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25301</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Palm, oh Palm. Forums have lamented it and predicted its end for about 5 year now... and I think it is on a fast downhill slide. No new OS, no new hardware, greatly slowed new software titles.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I enjoy the Centro, but do not love it- screen is small, inaccessible card (although SoftTick&#039;s Blue Files has helped me with that. I will be reviewing it soon), annoying buttons, etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;iPhones are dang cool and seem to be getting better, Blackberry is great, etc. Palm may well be a dead man walking.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I suspect that my next smart phone will not be a Palm either.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palm, oh Palm. Forums have lamented it and predicted its end for about 5 year now&#8230; and I think it is on a fast downhill slide. No new OS, no new hardware, greatly slowed new software titles.</p>
<p>I enjoy the Centro, but do not love it- screen is small, inaccessible card (although SoftTick&#8217;s Blue Files has helped me with that. I will be reviewing it soon), annoying buttons, etc.</p>
<p>iPhones are dang cool and seem to be getting better, Blackberry is great, etc. Palm may well be a dead man walking.</p>
<p>I suspect that my next smart phone will not be a Palm either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palmdoc</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25300</link>
		<dc:creator>Palmdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25300</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Julie. As a long time Palm user and owner of a Treo 650, 680 and the Centro, I think the Treo Pro is not bad for a WM device ;) 
I like the functionality and one-handedness which makes things surprisingly quite easy. For instance to get the Task manager, you don&#039;t have tap on the upper right hand corner, just Click and hold the OK button. Getting to the Today screen is just a click on the Red button.
Dialing and messaging contacts is as easy as typing in the name while in the Today screen.
There may be more short cut tips but as a long time PalmOS user, WM 6.1 is pretty decent.
I agree it&#039;s sluggish by comparison but hey at least so far I haven&#039;t had a reset ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Julie. As a long time Palm user and owner of a Treo 650, 680 and the Centro, I think the Treo Pro is not bad for a WM device <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I like the functionality and one-handedness which makes things surprisingly quite easy. For instance to get the Task manager, you don&#8217;t have tap on the upper right hand corner, just Click and hold the OK button. Getting to the Today screen is just a click on the Red button.<br />
Dialing and messaging contacts is as easy as typing in the name while in the Today screen.<br />
There may be more short cut tips but as a long time PalmOS user, WM 6.1 is pretty decent.<br />
I agree it&#8217;s sluggish by comparison but hey at least so far I haven&#8217;t had a reset <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: May C</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25299</link>
		<dc:creator>May C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25299</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I was a bit miffed about the Kinoma play not allowing video playback on the free version.  That kind of turns me off.  I did have to buy the Palm OS version of Kinoma Player and for me, had Kinoma given me a time limited trial version for Kinoma Play and I was able to view the streams, I may have considered it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t like the scanning of your entire card for media material and it&#039;s too big to keep installed.  I&#039;m not planning on getting Kinoma Play and just settling on viewing streams via bookmarks instead.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for Coreplayer, I also paid for the Palm OS version and was so disappointed that it didn&#039;t support steams (back when I bought it.  Not sure if it does now) so I have no plans to pay for another media player that will likely disappoint again.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not like these apps are cheap either.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I was a bit miffed about the Kinoma play not allowing video playback on the free version.  That kind of turns me off.  I did have to buy the Palm OS version of Kinoma Player and for me, had Kinoma given me a time limited trial version for Kinoma Play and I was able to view the streams, I may have considered it.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the scanning of your entire card for media material and it&#8217;s too big to keep installed.  I&#8217;m not planning on getting Kinoma Play and just settling on viewing streams via bookmarks instead.</p>
<p>As for Coreplayer, I also paid for the Palm OS version and was so disappointed that it didn&#8217;t support steams (back when I bought it.  Not sure if it does now) so I have no plans to pay for another media player that will likely disappoint again.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like these apps are cheap either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25298</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25298</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I spent about 30 minutes or so trying to get the video players: Kinoma and CorePlayer to work on the Pro. It appears that Kinoma wants you to buy it before you can even watch something... Same for CorePlayer. :o(&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent about 30 minutes or so trying to get the video players: Kinoma and CorePlayer to work on the Pro. It appears that Kinoma wants you to buy it before you can even watch something&#8230; Same for CorePlayer. <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> (</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornelis</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25297</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornelis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25297</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;About Android/G1...
ABSOLUTELY! :-)
But, as far as Europe is concerned it is no way near coming out.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of course I will check it out! Most important is: tactile feel of the keyboard, speed and (foremost) - synchronization. Will it do that as good and as bulletproof as the Centro with its Palm OS?
Guess we will just have to wait and see.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About Android/G1&#8230;<br />
ABSOLUTELY! <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
But, as far as Europe is concerned it is no way near coming out.</p>
<p>Of course I will check it out! Most important is: tactile feel of the keyboard, speed and (foremost) &#8211; synchronization. Will it do that as good and as bulletproof as the Centro with its Palm OS?<br />
Guess we will just have to wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmuhammad</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25296</link>
		<dc:creator>jmuhammad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 03:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25296</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was looking through the cons for the treo pro. Two of them are software related. Does running palm apps on StyleTap change anything (sluggish performance or video performance) if you were to install palm apps? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As far as expensive, my days of buying $500 phones are over...I&#039;m sitting here looking at my treo 650, looking at my T1 (which is my favorite PDA except I didn&#039;t need the slider), and all those accessories (keyboards for the UNIVERSAL connector that wasn&#039;t, cases, cradles, etc) I bought for them that are now collecting dust. I am happy with my centro ($99) and if they come out with an open source phone for cheap that&#039;s where I headed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m surprised at the buttons, and yes the centro&#039;s cover was very difficult as well. It is a little easier now that I&#039;ve had it about a year:)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And oh, I HATE windows mobile. I never plan to go there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the review. The treo pro LOOKS very nice though.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking through the cons for the treo pro. Two of them are software related. Does running palm apps on StyleTap change anything (sluggish performance or video performance) if you were to install palm apps? </p>
<p>As far as expensive, my days of buying $500 phones are over&#8230;I&#8217;m sitting here looking at my treo 650, looking at my T1 (which is my favorite PDA except I didn&#8217;t need the slider), and all those accessories (keyboards for the UNIVERSAL connector that wasn&#8217;t, cases, cradles, etc) I bought for them that are now collecting dust. I am happy with my centro ($99) and if they come out with an open source phone for cheap that&#8217;s where I headed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised at the buttons, and yes the centro&#8217;s cover was very difficult as well. It is a little easier now that I&#8217;ve had it about a year:)</p>
<p>And oh, I HATE windows mobile. I never plan to go there.</p>
<p>Thanks for the review. The treo pro LOOKS very nice though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25295</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25295</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just installed StyleTap and it seems to run fine with the 3 apps that come with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just installed StyleTap and it seems to run fine with the 3 apps that come with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmuhammad</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25294</link>
		<dc:creator>jmuhammad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25294</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Can Treo Pro run StyleTap?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can Treo Pro run StyleTap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25293</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25293</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;May:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m in the exact same place that you are. So I&#039;m sad in a way, but then excited too. I&#039;m actually charging up an old Nokia that I have. The N80. Why? I dunno... ;o) I could put the SIM back in my Centro, but I am just not inspired to do so.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the exact same place that you are. So I&#8217;m sad in a way, but then excited too. I&#8217;m actually charging up an old Nokia that I have. The N80. Why? I dunno&#8230; ;o) I could put the SIM back in my Centro, but I am just not inspired to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: May C</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25292</link>
		<dc:creator>May C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25292</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not surprised by your disappointment with the Treo Pro.  I think if Palm had kept the casing of the 800w for the Treo Pro that it may have been somewhat better.  I am very turned off by the cheap Centro keyboard (the keyboards are extremely important to me).  It&#039;s too bad the 800w works on the CDMA networks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am seriously considering moving on beyond Palm branded devices including Treos and seriously thinking Blackberry, Nokia and others.  The iPhone, although seems great, but again, the lack of a physical keyboard (the virtual ones don&#039;t work for me) and wireless keyboard support is what holds me back.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am thinking that my &#039;palm&#039; days are over.  Now, I&#039;m getting excited about getting something else.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised by your disappointment with the Treo Pro.  I think if Palm had kept the casing of the 800w for the Treo Pro that it may have been somewhat better.  I am very turned off by the cheap Centro keyboard (the keyboards are extremely important to me).  It&#8217;s too bad the 800w works on the CDMA networks.</p>
<p>I am seriously considering moving on beyond Palm branded devices including Treos and seriously thinking Blackberry, Nokia and others.  The iPhone, although seems great, but again, the lack of a physical keyboard (the virtual ones don&#8217;t work for me) and wireless keyboard support is what holds me back.</p>
<p>I am thinking that my &#8216;palm&#8217; days are over.  Now, I&#8217;m getting excited about getting something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25291</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25291</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What about the G1? Not tempted by Android?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the G1? Not tempted by Android?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornelis</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25290</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornelis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25290</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I read that you also mentioned it might be the hardware, but win mobile and this hardware is like Vista and the laptop issue: it killed the performance the hardware basically had. :-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I had a chance to play with a Blackberry (I think it was an 8020 or something like that [a device about 4 months old]), and I really didn&#039;t like it. Very unusual menu structure and a bit unlogical. Not my kind of device.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What would tickle my fancy, would be an iPhone - a little smaller and not &quot;luxurious&quot; as the current model. More  like a &quot;roughing it&quot; version :-) &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Otherwise I am waiting for the Tube to come out (Nkoia 5800 Xpress Music). I&#039;d like to daddle with that for a while!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that you also mentioned it might be the hardware, but win mobile and this hardware is like Vista and the laptop issue: it killed the performance the hardware basically had. <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I had a chance to play with a Blackberry (I think it was an 8020 or something like that [a device about 4 months old]), and I really didn&#8217;t like it. Very unusual menu structure and a bit unlogical. Not my kind of device.</p>
<p>What would tickle my fancy, would be an iPhone &#8211; a little smaller and not &#8220;luxurious&#8221; as the current model. More  like a &#8220;roughing it&#8221; version <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Otherwise I am waiting for the Tube to come out (Nkoia 5800 Xpress Music). I&#8217;d like to daddle with that for a while!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Puckett</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25289</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Puckett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25289</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Julie:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Treo Pro looked like a nice device on paper, but the proof is in the pudding. Thanks for the great review. I am no longer tempted to buy it, as if I could afford it anyway. :-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t like Windows Mobile at all. It takes 5 clicks to get anything done. I have a new iTouch that I like alot, but I&#039;m not so sure I&#039;d want it to be my phone OS. Other than the browsing experience, I love my Centro. I wish someone would come out with a better browser for Palm OS. I&#039;d pay $30 for a decent browser.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie:</p>
<p>The Treo Pro looked like a nice device on paper, but the proof is in the pudding. Thanks for the great review. I am no longer tempted to buy it, as if I could afford it anyway. <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like Windows Mobile at all. It takes 5 clicks to get anything done. I have a new iTouch that I like alot, but I&#8217;m not so sure I&#8217;d want it to be my phone OS. Other than the browsing experience, I love my Centro. I wish someone would come out with a better browser for Palm OS. I&#8217;d pay $30 for a decent browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25288</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25288</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Cornelis:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I want to like Windows Mobile each time I decide to give it another try and it never works out for me. So yeah, I would definitely concede that I probably don&#039;t love this phone because of the OS. But it&#039;s the hardware too. That&#039;s why I mentioned that even if this had Palm OS on it, I would still be unhappy. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m seriously considering trying another Blackberry device soon. I liked the Pearl when I reviewed it a few years ago. The data plan was the prohibitive issue then...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cornelis:</p>
<p>I want to like Windows Mobile each time I decide to give it another try and it never works out for me. So yeah, I would definitely concede that I probably don&#8217;t love this phone because of the OS. But it&#8217;s the hardware too. That&#8217;s why I mentioned that even if this had Palm OS on it, I would still be unhappy. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m seriously considering trying another Blackberry device soon. I liked the Pearl when I reviewed it a few years ago. The data plan was the prohibitive issue then&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornelis</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/10/24/palm_treo_pro_smartphone_review/comment-page-1/#comment-25287</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornelis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25287</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, I don&#039;t think the word &quot;underwhelming&quot; has been used often by the gadgeteer..!!!
But since your reviews have always been correct (I bought stuff even when your opinion was not a good one and in the aftermath I had to go in accordance with you when I had the said device), I was really disappointed for the Treo Pro.
In the past 12 years I think I have owned, altogether, 4 devices with Windows CE or Mobile or whatever mini Win was on a device, and it is basically all the same: lame, lame lame
I would suspect it is Windows again. It&#039;s just a (cell) phone killer. It has no business being on a device...
Too bad, so I guess I will be waiting some more with my trusty Treo Centro.
Thanks Jules!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I don&#8217;t think the word &#8220;underwhelming&#8221; has been used often by the gadgeteer..!!!<br />
But since your reviews have always been correct (I bought stuff even when your opinion was not a good one and in the aftermath I had to go in accordance with you when I had the said device), I was really disappointed for the Treo Pro.<br />
In the past 12 years I think I have owned, altogether, 4 devices with Windows CE or Mobile or whatever mini Win was on a device, and it is basically all the same: lame, lame lame<br />
I would suspect it is Windows again. It&#8217;s just a (cell) phone killer. It has no business being on a device&#8230;<br />
Too bad, so I guess I will be waiting some more with my trusty Treo Centro.<br />
Thanks Jules!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

