<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Purebuds Digital Earphones Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/08/05/purebuds_digital_earphones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/08/05/purebuds_digital_earphones/</link>
	<description>Gadget reviews and news by Julie Strietelmeier and friends since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 21:11:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weixin</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/08/05/purebuds_digital_earphones/comment-page-1/#comment-101443</link>
		<dc:creator>Weixin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 02:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-101443</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand the rave regarding these earphones- I&#039;ve tested them against other sub-50 earphones like the Final Audio Piano Forte II, and these are frankly some of the worst sounds I&#039;ve heard. The reverse sound technology is extremely muddy, and the detail that you get with other earbuds or IEMs is completely lost.

Subwoofer-like bass? What nonsense- I can get better response with the PF2s as well. This wasn&#039;t worth the 50bucks I spent on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand the rave regarding these earphones- I&#8217;ve tested them against other sub-50 earphones like the Final Audio Piano Forte II, and these are frankly some of the worst sounds I&#8217;ve heard. The reverse sound technology is extremely muddy, and the detail that you get with other earbuds or IEMs is completely lost.</p>
<p>Subwoofer-like bass? What nonsense- I can get better response with the PF2s as well. This wasn&#8217;t worth the 50bucks I spent on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MICHAEL</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/08/05/purebuds_digital_earphones/comment-page-1/#comment-85221</link>
		<dc:creator>MICHAEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 04:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-85221</guid>
		<description>IS THIS AVAILABLE HERE IN PHILIPPINES?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IS THIS AVAILABLE HERE IN PHILIPPINES?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/08/05/purebuds_digital_earphones/comment-page-1/#comment-34316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-34316</guid>
		<description>I own the Purebuds and they do indeed deliver reverse sound technology for a safer way to enjoy audio.  Plus I like the custom audio tips so you can personalize your audio listening effects like bass boost, surround sound,and full range audio. The quality is 1st class so for $49 this is a good value especially compared to Bose/JBL etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own the Purebuds and they do indeed deliver reverse sound technology for a safer way to enjoy audio.  Plus I like the custom audio tips so you can personalize your audio listening effects like bass boost, surround sound,and full range audio. The quality is 1st class so for $49 this is a good value especially compared to Bose/JBL etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Tongue</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/08/05/purebuds_digital_earphones/comment-page-1/#comment-25151</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Tongue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25151</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i&#039;d recommend the sennheiser px 100&#039;s since they are relatively  cheap and provide excellent sound quality however they are headphones not earphones&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;d recommend the sennheiser px 100&#8242;s since they are relatively  cheap and provide excellent sound quality however they are headphones not earphones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Dorff</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/08/05/purebuds_digital_earphones/comment-page-1/#comment-25150</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C. Dorff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25150</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll stick with my Shure SE210&#039;s (not cheap, although there are deals to be found if you are resourceful and patient) or my Etymotics ER-6i&#039;s (somewhat more reasonably priced). Yeah, neither of them are in the mentioned $50 price range, but the difference in sound quality is astonishing, in my opinion, especially in high noise situations. I work in Manhattan - I walk the streets, take the subway, and ride the train and for me a good pair of sound isolating headphones is a must. Plus, I imagine playing my music at a lower volume extends my battery.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll stick with my Shure SE210&#8242;s (not cheap, although there are deals to be found if you are resourceful and patient) or my Etymotics ER-6i&#8217;s (somewhat more reasonably priced). Yeah, neither of them are in the mentioned $50 price range, but the difference in sound quality is astonishing, in my opinion, especially in high noise situations. I work in Manhattan &#8211; I walk the streets, take the subway, and ride the train and for me a good pair of sound isolating headphones is a must. Plus, I imagine playing my music at a lower volume extends my battery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

