Comments on: PhatWare’s PhatNotes Standard – Windows Mobile Utility http://the-gadgeteer.com/2007/05/21/phatware_s_phatnotes_standard_windows_mobile_utility/ Gadget reviews and news by Julie Strietelmeier and friends since 1997 Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:52:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: klanum http://the-gadgeteer.com/2007/05/21/phatware_s_phatnotes_standard_windows_mobile_utility/comment-page-1/#comment-24065 klanum Sat, 26 May 2007 03:57:20 +0000 #comment-24065 ripardi - Thanks for the comments. I'll take them for the constructive purpose in which they were intended! :D ripardi – Thanks for the comments. I’ll take them for the constructive purpose in which they were intended! :D

]]> By: ripardi http://the-gadgeteer.com/2007/05/21/phatware_s_phatnotes_standard_windows_mobile_utility/comment-page-1/#comment-24064 ripardi Mon, 21 May 2007 23:49:12 +0000 #comment-24064 Thank you for the thorough review. However, I'd like to give a couple of comments in terms of reviewing style. As for the html/formatting of your review: please use headings, bolding and such with moderation. Your review looks very different compared to 'the-gadgeteer standards'. Also, cut down the use of manufacturer-provided text. IMHO, it's O.K. to copy-paste technical specs but repeating word to word all those 20 pretty trivial features of a software is too much. And the same goes with the description taken from the phatware's web site. You could have just provided us with a hyperlink (that's what HTML was invented for) if too lazy to use your own words. Third, don't use that heavy compression on JPEG images. They just look ugly. With these nice and encouraging words, I thank you for the review and wish you all the best :D Thank you for the thorough review. However, I’d like to give a couple of comments in terms of reviewing style. As for the html/formatting of your review: please use headings, bolding and such with moderation. Your review looks very different compared to ‘the-gadgeteer standards’. Also, cut down the use of manufacturer-provided text. IMHO, it’s O.K. to copy-paste technical specs but repeating word to word all those 20 pretty trivial features of a software is too much. And the same goes with the description taken from the phatware’s web site. You could have just provided us with a hyperlink (that’s what HTML was invented for) if too lazy to use your own words. Third, don’t use that heavy compression on JPEG images. They just look ugly. With these nice and encouraging words, I thank you for the review and wish you all the best :D

]]> By: Julie http://the-gadgeteer.com/2007/05/21/phatware_s_phatnotes_standard_windows_mobile_utility/comment-page-1/#comment-24063 Julie Mon, 21 May 2007 19:19:52 +0000 #comment-24063 Post your comments here on the PhatWare's PhatNotes Standard - Windows Mobile Utility Review: <a href="http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/review/phatware_s_phatnotes_standard_windows_mobile_utility">http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/review/phatware_s_phatnotes_standard_windows_mobile_utility</a> Just click the POST REPLY button on this page. Post your comments here on the PhatWare’s PhatNotes Standard – Windows Mobile Utility Review:

http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/review/phatware_s_phatnotes_standard_windows_mobile_utility

Just click the POST REPLY button on this page.

]]>