<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WaterField Design Apple iPod nano Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2005/10/17/waterfield_design_apple_ipod_nano_case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2005/10/17/waterfield_design_apple_ipod_nano_case/</link>
	<description>Gadget reviews and news by Julie Strietelmeier and friends since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 12:44:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2005/10/17/waterfield_design_apple_ipod_nano_case/comment-page-1/#comment-21996</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21996</guid>
		<description>Illetirres:

In my opinion, it&#039;s hard to blame Waterfield for nano scratches. I really believe that Apple has used an inferior plastic with this new model. It&#039;s just crazy how easy it is to scratch the face of this player. It&#039;s not normal and not representative of their prior models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Illetirres:</p>
<p>In my opinion, it&#8217;s hard to blame Waterfield for nano scratches. I really believe that Apple has used an inferior plastic with this new model. It&#8217;s just crazy how easy it is to scratch the face of this player. It&#8217;s not normal and not representative of their prior models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Illetirres</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2005/10/17/waterfield_design_apple_ipod_nano_case/comment-page-1/#comment-21995</link>
		<dc:creator>Illetirres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 15:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21995</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review. I too bought the Waterfield case and have returned it. As you noted the fit is a little tight and put fine scratches all the way along the face of my nano the first time I put it in. Waterfield makes some great products, just not this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review. I too bought the Waterfield case and have returned it. As you noted the fit is a little tight and put fine scratches all the way along the face of my nano the first time I put it in. Waterfield makes some great products, just not this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2005/10/17/waterfield_design_apple_ipod_nano_case/comment-page-1/#comment-21994</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21994</guid>
		<description>Post your comments here on the WaterField Design Apple iPod nano Case review.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/review/waterfield_design_apple_ipod_nano_case&quot;&gt;http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/review/waterfield_design_apple_ipod_nano_case&lt;/a&gt;

Just click the POST REPLY button on this page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post your comments here on the WaterField Design Apple iPod nano Case review.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/review/waterfield_design_apple_ipod_nano_case">http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/review/waterfield_design_apple_ipod_nano_case</a></p>
<p>Just click the POST REPLY button on this page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

