<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bluetake BT400 G3 Bluetooth Headset Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/10/21/_bluetake_bt400_g3_bluetooth_headset_review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/10/21/_bluetake_bt400_g3_bluetooth_headset_review/</link>
	<description>Gadget reviews and news by Julie Strietelmeier and friends since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 01:04:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgallina</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/10/21/_bluetake_bt400_g3_bluetooth_headset_review/comment-page-1/#comment-20424</link>
		<dc:creator>dgallina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20424</guid>
		<description>Good review.  I&#039;d suggest that prospective purchasers will also want to try the Jabra BT250 headset.  I&#039;ve had the older Jabra BT100 as well as the current Jabra BT250.  The BT250 is competitive with the Bluetake in terms of functions, but features (IMHO) better construction and execution (fewer of the bugs mentioned in the Bluetake review).  It is somewhat more expensive at around $100, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review.  I&#8217;d suggest that prospective purchasers will also want to try the Jabra BT250 headset.  I&#8217;ve had the older Jabra BT100 as well as the current Jabra BT250.  The BT250 is competitive with the Bluetake in terms of functions, but features (IMHO) better construction and execution (fewer of the bugs mentioned in the Bluetake review).  It is somewhat more expensive at around $100, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/10/21/_bluetake_bt400_g3_bluetooth_headset_review/comment-page-1/#comment-20423</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2004 00:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20423</guid>
		<description>Post your comments here on the Bluetake BT400 G3 Bluetooth Headset review.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/bluetake-bt500-headset-review.html&quot;&gt;http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/bluetake-bt500-headset-review.html&lt;/a&gt;

Just click the POST REPLY button on this page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post your comments here on the Bluetake BT400 G3 Bluetooth Headset review.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/bluetake-bt500-headset-review.html">http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/bluetake-bt500-headset-review.html</a></p>
<p>Just click the POST REPLY button on this page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

