<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yearlong Look back at the Tungsten&#124;C Article</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/</link>
	<description>Gadget reviews and news by Julie Strietelmeier and friends since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 01:04:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZSideroad</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19667</link>
		<dc:creator>AZSideroad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19667</guid>
		<description>Hey, sorry to hear your T&#124;C was jacked/stolen. I had one and enjoyed it despite some if the problems I had with it. I had a small area of light the bled from right above the plastic frame around the screen on the lower left of the display. I also wasn&#039;t satisfied with the WiFi range, not much better then Bluetooth. Cool, but I think they (PalmOne) should&#039;ve given the T&#124;C the T&#124;W&#039;s antenna for increased range. I did love the battery life and the RAM. My Zodiac gets great battery life, and has more RAM, but the T&#124;C was a champ when WiFi was off when it came to battery life. The &quot;deal&quot; killers on the T&#124;C that prompted me to switch to another device was I use Voice Recorder and you need a headset to use it. Not just any 2.5mm headset will do, but you have to get one of PalmOne&#039;s models or one that works with certain Nokia phones. Also, due to that same design feature/flaw multimedia playback on the T&#124;C blows, period. The T&#124;C is for those that multimedia (MP3, video, photos) isn&#039;t a major concern. I use my PDAs for multimedia and I bought it thinking I could live with that in mind. I couldn&#039;t. 

Also, using a PalmOne device made me realize another feature that is now a must have for me in any PDA. Vibration/silent alert feature. The Zodiac takes this to a new level with vibration feedback in games, but from a productivity standpoint it is essential when an audible alert is unacceptable. I kid you not, I once had my Visor Deluxe go off in a meeting and start playing Taps (my reminder alarm). Now, when I&#039;m in a meeting I just temporarily mute my Zodiac. I love that feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, sorry to hear your T|C was jacked/stolen. I had one and enjoyed it despite some if the problems I had with it. I had a small area of light the bled from right above the plastic frame around the screen on the lower left of the display. I also wasn&#8217;t satisfied with the WiFi range, not much better then Bluetooth. Cool, but I think they (PalmOne) should&#8217;ve given the T|C the T|W&#8217;s antenna for increased range. I did love the battery life and the RAM. My Zodiac gets great battery life, and has more RAM, but the T|C was a champ when WiFi was off when it came to battery life. The &#8220;deal&#8221; killers on the T|C that prompted me to switch to another device was I use Voice Recorder and you need a headset to use it. Not just any 2.5mm headset will do, but you have to get one of PalmOne&#8217;s models or one that works with certain Nokia phones. Also, due to that same design feature/flaw multimedia playback on the T|C blows, period. The T|C is for those that multimedia (MP3, video, photos) isn&#8217;t a major concern. I use my PDAs for multimedia and I bought it thinking I could live with that in mind. I couldn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Also, using a PalmOne device made me realize another feature that is now a must have for me in any PDA. Vibration/silent alert feature. The Zodiac takes this to a new level with vibration feedback in games, but from a productivity standpoint it is essential when an audible alert is unacceptable. I kid you not, I once had my Visor Deluxe go off in a meeting and start playing Taps (my reminder alarm). Now, when I&#8217;m in a meeting I just temporarily mute my Zodiac. I love that feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19666</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 19:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19666</guid>
		<description>thanks for the info. I really miss my TC and thinking of ordering another one. I might just wait to see what Palm has up there sleeve with the next generation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the info. I really miss my TC and thinking of ordering another one. I might just wait to see what Palm has up there sleeve with the next generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kpr</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19665</link>
		<dc:creator>kpr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2004 22:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19665</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted by Matt &lt;/em&gt;
[B]I had one of the first TC... 
Anybody ever wardrive with a TC? 
What kind of internet software is out there for the TC now? 
Does it support pop ups yet, that was always one thing that bugged me about the TC. 
I also wonder if it supports landscape mode? [/B]&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

To wardrive, the best software is still NetChaser, which helps you find Wi-Fi hotspots by sounding an alarm or vibrating every time you are within range of a Wi-Fi access point.

The updated version of Web Pro, version 3.0.1, handles pop ups, and is a very good web browser. But the update from PalmOne is NOT free as it should be since there are many bugs in Web Pro version 2.x that ships with the TC.

The Zire 72 ships with version 3.5 of Web Pro.

Both version 3.0.1 and 3.5 of Web Pro support landscape mode on the T3, which I feel is the best web browsing experience I have ever had on a PDA.

Another useful piece of internet software is Hand/RSS, a RSS news feed reader.

VersaMail is good email program too.

By the way, the TC is still my favorite PDA up to this point. Nothing beats its long battery life, fast speed, and it has been very reliable for me. I take it every where I go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Originally posted by Matt </em><br />
[B]I had one of the first TC&#8230;<br />
Anybody ever wardrive with a TC?<br />
What kind of internet software is out there for the TC now?<br />
Does it support pop ups yet, that was always one thing that bugged me about the TC.<br />
I also wonder if it supports landscape mode? [/B]</p></blockquote>
<p>To wardrive, the best software is still NetChaser, which helps you find Wi-Fi hotspots by sounding an alarm or vibrating every time you are within range of a Wi-Fi access point.</p>
<p>The updated version of Web Pro, version 3.0.1, handles pop ups, and is a very good web browser. But the update from PalmOne is NOT free as it should be since there are many bugs in Web Pro version 2.x that ships with the TC.</p>
<p>The Zire 72 ships with version 3.5 of Web Pro.</p>
<p>Both version 3.0.1 and 3.5 of Web Pro support landscape mode on the T3, which I feel is the best web browsing experience I have ever had on a PDA.</p>
<p>Another useful piece of internet software is Hand/RSS, a RSS news feed reader.</p>
<p>VersaMail is good email program too.</p>
<p>By the way, the TC is still my favorite PDA up to this point. Nothing beats its long battery life, fast speed, and it has been very reliable for me. I take it every where I go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onestar</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19664</link>
		<dc:creator>onestar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2004 15:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19664</guid>
		<description>Well, after reading this article, a few others concerning Wi-Fi-based handhelds, and other factors, I&#039;ve sold my Dell Axim X5 and ordered a TC.

We&#039;ve an excellent wi-fi network at work, and I was using the PPC &quot;in the field&quot;, but I&#039;ve grown exceedingly frustrutated with the &quot;tempermental&quot; PPC applications (specifically, Pocket Internet Explorer...it would fail to detect network settings more often that it would recognize them).

Combine that with a preference for Palms (I&#039;ve had one since my Palm Pilot Professional that I upgraded with the 2MB kit years ago), I&#039;d decided it was time to upgrade to the TC.

With any luck, I&#039;ll get as good as mileage as you have.  Thanks for the informative article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, after reading this article, a few others concerning Wi-Fi-based handhelds, and other factors, I&#8217;ve sold my Dell Axim X5 and ordered a TC.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve an excellent wi-fi network at work, and I was using the PPC &#8220;in the field&#8221;, but I&#8217;ve grown exceedingly frustrutated with the &#8220;tempermental&#8221; PPC applications (specifically, Pocket Internet Explorer&#8230;it would fail to detect network settings more often that it would recognize them).</p>
<p>Combine that with a preference for Palms (I&#8217;ve had one since my Palm Pilot Professional that I upgraded with the 2MB kit years ago), I&#8217;d decided it was time to upgrade to the TC.</p>
<p>With any luck, I&#8217;ll get as good as mileage as you have.  Thanks for the informative article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lmilovy</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19663</link>
		<dc:creator>lmilovy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2004 03:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19663</guid>
		<description>Oh, kfind. I forgot.

Probably the top endoresment of any kind of technology is &quot;I&#039;ve never had to think about it.&quot; 
The most demanding stream from the SD slot was from Audible streaming audiobooks. It was flawless. Working with the SD slot streaming video, images, or data has never been slow enough to make any kind of impression on me. 

It works. Enough said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, kfind. I forgot.</p>
<p>Probably the top endoresment of any kind of technology is &#8220;I&#8217;ve never had to think about it.&#8221;<br />
The most demanding stream from the SD slot was from Audible streaming audiobooks. It was flawless. Working with the SD slot streaming video, images, or data has never been slow enough to make any kind of impression on me. </p>
<p>It works. Enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lmilovy</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19662</link>
		<dc:creator>lmilovy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2004 03:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19662</guid>
		<description>I agree about it should have been privately. Honestly it was something that shot off the top of my head. It was my first time to use the forum. My bad. You know the girl in high school that babbled endlessly all day? That&#039;s me. 

In my opinion Julie and Judie run the highest quality review site on the web. By far. Their contribution to personally getting the correct gadgets is incalculable. On top of that on several occasions, Julie has taken the time to personally recomend cases for me. And they do it for free. My many thanks, let me know if I can ever do you a favor!

Listen, I&#039;m no insurance salesman, so I have no idea if renters and homeowners insurance are similar. But surely endorsement policies are avaliable for each. Bottom line, Palms are so easy to lose, make sure it&#039;s insured.

lm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about it should have been privately. Honestly it was something that shot off the top of my head. It was my first time to use the forum. My bad. You know the girl in high school that babbled endlessly all day? That&#8217;s me. </p>
<p>In my opinion Julie and Judie run the highest quality review site on the web. By far. Their contribution to personally getting the correct gadgets is incalculable. On top of that on several occasions, Julie has taken the time to personally recomend cases for me. And they do it for free. My many thanks, let me know if I can ever do you a favor!</p>
<p>Listen, I&#8217;m no insurance salesman, so I have no idea if renters and homeowners insurance are similar. But surely endorsement policies are avaliable for each. Bottom line, Palms are so easy to lose, make sure it&#8217;s insured.</p>
<p>lm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kfind</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19661</link>
		<dc:creator>kfind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2004 20:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19661</guid>
		<description>Found the writeup about the Tungsten C a year later to be most helpful, since it seems to be indepth and accurate. I was wondering about your use of the SD media card and how well this works in the Tungsten C? I currently using a Treo 90 and have 50 Megs of files on the SD card that I constantly reference. The Tungsten C with a 400 Mhz processor is much faster, and the minute+ wait to bring up some doc readers presently could be a thing of the past with a Tungsten C. 

Any comments..

Thanks

kfind</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found the writeup about the Tungsten C a year later to be most helpful, since it seems to be indepth and accurate. I was wondering about your use of the SD media card and how well this works in the Tungsten C? I currently using a Treo 90 and have 50 Megs of files on the SD card that I constantly reference. The Tungsten C with a 400 Mhz processor is much faster, and the minute+ wait to bring up some doc readers presently could be a thing of the past with a Tungsten C. </p>
<p>Any comments..</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>kfind</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FFSteve</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19660</link>
		<dc:creator>FFSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 19:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19660</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m disappointed to see the dialogue between the site owner and writer of the article taking place on this BB.  I think it would have been more appropriate to do it privately.  And I guess to be fair to the author, anytime changes to content are made, the article should be returned for input before posting.  That would also be a good time to point out mistakes which might need correcting.  Just my two cents however, I&#039;m sure both parties had the best intentions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m disappointed to see the dialogue between the site owner and writer of the article taking place on this BB.  I think it would have been more appropriate to do it privately.  And I guess to be fair to the author, anytime changes to content are made, the article should be returned for input before posting.  That would also be a good time to point out mistakes which might need correcting.  Just my two cents however, I&#8217;m sure both parties had the best intentions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19659</link>
		<dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 23:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19659</guid>
		<description>ahhhhh - &lt;strong&gt;renter&#039;s insurance&lt;/strong&gt;.

Back from the good ol&#039; carefree days before I was a homeowner. :D

Makes me wish for those simpler times...:p </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahhhhh &#8211; <strong>renter&#8217;s insurance</strong>.</p>
<p>Back from the good ol&#8217; carefree days before I was a homeowner. <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Makes me wish for those simpler times&#8230;:p </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vidge</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19658</link>
		<dc:creator>Vidge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 22:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19658</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to beat this to death either but from the article (emphasis is mine):

&lt;blockquote&gt;I had added a ridiculously cheap (far cheaper than a good case) endorsement in my &lt;strong&gt;renters&lt;/strong&gt; insurance policy for my Palm&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Perhaps &lt;strong&gt;renter&#039;s&lt;/strong&gt; insurance has a different thing than &lt;strong&gt; homeowners&#039;&lt;/strong&gt; insurance.

Just a thought.:p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to beat this to death either but from the article (emphasis is mine):</p>
<blockquote><p>I had added a ridiculously cheap (far cheaper than a good case) endorsement in my <strong>renters</strong> insurance policy for my Palm</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps <strong>renter&#8217;s</strong> insurance has a different thing than <strong> homeowners&#8217;</strong> insurance.</p>
<p>Just a thought.:p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19657</link>
		<dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 18:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19657</guid>
		<description>Beating a dead horse - always fun...so here I go:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted by lmilovy &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;In addition, My computer is worth about 3000$. If I break it or drop it when I move or aliens abduct it, I don&#039;t have 3k on hand to get a replace it. For that event, I might have to sit down with an adjuster. In that case it would be the SEPERATE ENDORSEMENT that went up. Since it&#039;s 35$ now I wouldn&#039;t think that would break the bank. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

I wish this was always the case. I had a $20K item that was carried under a separate endorsement rider on my homeowner&#039;s insurance for a cost of approx. $250 a year. A portion of this item was lost, and a $6K claim was filed with the payment check going straight to the company that did the replacement.

Yesterday I called to see if I could qualify for insurance with another company because my newest renewal quote was so high. I found out that &lt;strong&gt;this claim&lt;/strong&gt; - for an item that was carried under a &lt;em&gt;separate endorsement rider&lt;/em&gt; - not only is counted as a regular strike against my policy, but it is also part of why my homeowner&#039;s insurance has risen for the last two years (since the claim was made).

Insurance companies do not appreciate claims. Period. Homeowner&#039;s policies are expensive enough without giving them a reason to add additional strikes against you.

I think it would be a better idea to buy a policy for items you can&#039;t afford to replace under a separate policy, not affiliated with your homeowner&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beating a dead horse &#8211; always fun&#8230;so here I go:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Originally posted by lmilovy </em><br />
<strong>In addition, My computer is worth about 3000$. If I break it or drop it when I move or aliens abduct it, I don&#8217;t have 3k on hand to get a replace it. For that event, I might have to sit down with an adjuster. In that case it would be the SEPERATE ENDORSEMENT that went up. Since it&#8217;s 35$ now I wouldn&#8217;t think that would break the bank. </strong></p></blockquote>
<p>I wish this was always the case. I had a $20K item that was carried under a separate endorsement rider on my homeowner&#8217;s insurance for a cost of approx. $250 a year. A portion of this item was lost, and a $6K claim was filed with the payment check going straight to the company that did the replacement.</p>
<p>Yesterday I called to see if I could qualify for insurance with another company because my newest renewal quote was so high. I found out that <strong>this claim</strong> &#8211; for an item that was carried under a <em>separate endorsement rider</em> &#8211; not only is counted as a regular strike against my policy, but it is also part of why my homeowner&#8217;s insurance has risen for the last two years (since the claim was made).</p>
<p>Insurance companies do not appreciate claims. Period. Homeowner&#8217;s policies are expensive enough without giving them a reason to add additional strikes against you.</p>
<p>I think it would be a better idea to buy a policy for items you can&#8217;t afford to replace under a separate policy, not affiliated with your homeowner&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19656</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 18:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19656</guid>
		<description>I had one of the first TC and sold it after alot of complains on screens breaking without abuse. Have you heard of this problem with the later units and if so what do you think about it? I didn&#039;t dare carry my TC with a case .
  I sold the TC and jumped to the TE. All tho its a great unit, I miss the extra 32mb and wifi for wireless syncing at home . Anybody ever wardrive with a TC? What kind of internet software is out there for the TC now? Does it support pop ups yet, that was always one thing that bugged me about the TC .I also wonder if it supports landscape mode?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had one of the first TC and sold it after alot of complains on screens breaking without abuse. Have you heard of this problem with the later units and if so what do you think about it? I didn&#8217;t dare carry my TC with a case .<br />
  I sold the TC and jumped to the TE. All tho its a great unit, I miss the extra 32mb and wifi for wireless syncing at home . Anybody ever wardrive with a TC? What kind of internet software is out there for the TC now? Does it support pop ups yet, that was always one thing that bugged me about the TC .I also wonder if it supports landscape mode?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Te_Aito</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19655</link>
		<dc:creator>Te_Aito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2004 05:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19655</guid>
		<description>I have always enjoyed this site, but I just had to comment on the remark that implies someone switching to or running a Mac will have &quot;a whole nightmare of software incompatibility, shoddy updates and no one selling accessories you need&quot;.  Of course you cannot run Win specific programs on a Mac (at least not without Virtual PC), and vice versa.  There are no &quot;shoddy updates&quot;, nor do I have any trouble at all finding accessories I need or want.  Perhaps the author might want to consider how things are written before complaining about editors...

~An irritated Mac user
(two years, and not going back to a Win system)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always enjoyed this site, but I just had to comment on the remark that implies someone switching to or running a Mac will have &#8220;a whole nightmare of software incompatibility, shoddy updates and no one selling accessories you need&#8221;.  Of course you cannot run Win specific programs on a Mac (at least not without Virtual PC), and vice versa.  There are no &#8220;shoddy updates&#8221;, nor do I have any trouble at all finding accessories I need or want.  Perhaps the author might want to consider how things are written before complaining about editors&#8230;</p>
<p>~An irritated Mac user<br />
(two years, and not going back to a Win system)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lmilovy</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19654</link>
		<dc:creator>lmilovy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2004 18:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19654</guid>
		<description>Julie, I took special effort in that last post to say it doesn&#039;t bother me. Of course I was making a wider point.

Secondly, considering insurance, I read the discussion over insurance. In general people over there were fundamentally confused about the nature of the insurance you should have for your Palm.

Of course homeowners doesn&#039;t normally cover losing your Palm Pilot. it was a SEPERATE ENDORSEMENT added to my covereage for like 35$ a year. For my elecrtronics, Playstation, etc I have 20,000$ in complete replacement cost. I lost about 640$ in equiment. They mailed me a check for 640$

My insurance did not go up one bit. 

In addition, My computer is worth about 3000$. If I break it or drop it when I move or aliens abduct it, I don&#039;t have 3k on hand to get a replace it. For that event, I might have to sit down with an adjuster. In that case it would be the SEPERATE ENDORSEMENT that went up. Since it&#039;s 35$ now I wouldn&#039;t think that would break the bank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie, I took special effort in that last post to say it doesn&#8217;t bother me. Of course I was making a wider point.</p>
<p>Secondly, considering insurance, I read the discussion over insurance. In general people over there were fundamentally confused about the nature of the insurance you should have for your Palm.</p>
<p>Of course homeowners doesn&#8217;t normally cover losing your Palm Pilot. it was a SEPERATE ENDORSEMENT added to my covereage for like 35$ a year. For my elecrtronics, Playstation, etc I have 20,000$ in complete replacement cost. I lost about 640$ in equiment. They mailed me a check for 640$</p>
<p>My insurance did not go up one bit. </p>
<p>In addition, My computer is worth about 3000$. If I break it or drop it when I move or aliens abduct it, I don&#8217;t have 3k on hand to get a replace it. For that event, I might have to sit down with an adjuster. In that case it would be the SEPERATE ENDORSEMENT that went up. Since it&#8217;s 35$ now I wouldn&#8217;t think that would break the bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Error94</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19653</link>
		<dc:creator>Error94</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2004 15:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19653</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted by lmilovy &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;...I get a little uncomfortable when any editor changes my work, other than editing for format and clarity.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Someone doesn&#039;t get published much, do they?  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Originally posted by lmilovy </em><br />
<strong>&#8230;I get a little uncomfortable when any editor changes my work, other than editing for format and clarity.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Someone doesn&#8217;t get published much, do they?  <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Error94</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19652</link>
		<dc:creator>Error94</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2004 15:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19652</guid>
		<description>In response to using your insurance to replace a PDA or other relatively inexpensive (and by inexpensive, I mean in comparison to, say... a house), people might want to check the comments in this thread: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/vbbs/showthread.php?threadid=445&quot;&gt;http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/vbbs/showthread.php?threadid=445&lt;/a&gt;.  It is generally considered to &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; be a good idea.  The cons tend to outweigh the pros.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to using your insurance to replace a PDA or other relatively inexpensive (and by inexpensive, I mean in comparison to, say&#8230; a house), people might want to check the comments in this thread: <a href="http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/vbbs/showthread.php?threadid=445">http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/vbbs/showthread.php?threadid=445</a>.  It is generally considered to <strong>not</strong> be a good idea.  The cons tend to outweigh the pros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19651</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2004 01:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19651</guid>
		<description>Lauren,

I&#039;m confused... If you were so concerned that adding the aforementioned comment might be the wrong way to go, then why did you do it?

As for editing your work, that&#039;s my prerogative whether it is for clarity or content. You actually had some facts wrong in a couple of places where you were talking about Judie when it should have been me, or visa versa.  Anyway, if it bothers you that I edited the article, I can remove it if you wish.  Just say the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lauren,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m confused&#8230; If you were so concerned that adding the aforementioned comment might be the wrong way to go, then why did you do it?</p>
<p>As for editing your work, that&#8217;s my prerogative whether it is for clarity or content. You actually had some facts wrong in a couple of places where you were talking about Judie when it should have been me, or visa versa.  Anyway, if it bothers you that I edited the article, I can remove it if you wish.  Just say the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lmilovy</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19650</link>
		<dc:creator>lmilovy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2004 00:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19650</guid>
		<description>No, I was actually concerned that trying to work a little humor into the review would not be up to the high journalistic standards of the site. After all, we all come here because Julie and Judie have maintained a site for years with absolutely no BS reviews and 100% credibility.

Those high journalistic standards are why I say the following, and please do not take this personally Julie, but I get a little uncomfortable when any editor changes my work, other than editing for format and clarity.

In this case it could be argued it was for clarity, which is why I chose to see the whole thing as ironic. I mean that in the sense I honestly have no idea what offends people&#039;s sensabilities nowadays. I don&#039;t even blink at the self-loving bear skits on Conan. I bet if I blocked the words &quot;hot asian&quot; from my inbox, it would cut down dramatically on spam. I don&#039;t have a male organ myself, but if I ever do it&#039;s comforting to know there are a lot of people out there with options, just in case. 

Actually drunken cheerleaders and frat houses are pretty tame. And I say that only as a retrospective comment of being a twentysomething and remember when Madonna&#039;s Vouge albumn was threatening the moral fiber of America. 

Anyway, keep up the great  site J&amp;J.

Lmil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I was actually concerned that trying to work a little humor into the review would not be up to the high journalistic standards of the site. After all, we all come here because Julie and Judie have maintained a site for years with absolutely no BS reviews and 100% credibility.</p>
<p>Those high journalistic standards are why I say the following, and please do not take this personally Julie, but I get a little uncomfortable when any editor changes my work, other than editing for format and clarity.</p>
<p>In this case it could be argued it was for clarity, which is why I chose to see the whole thing as ironic. I mean that in the sense I honestly have no idea what offends people&#8217;s sensabilities nowadays. I don&#8217;t even blink at the self-loving bear skits on Conan. I bet if I blocked the words &#8220;hot asian&#8221; from my inbox, it would cut down dramatically on spam. I don&#8217;t have a male organ myself, but if I ever do it&#8217;s comforting to know there are a lot of people out there with options, just in case. </p>
<p>Actually drunken cheerleaders and frat houses are pretty tame. And I say that only as a retrospective comment of being a twentysomething and remember when Madonna&#8217;s Vouge albumn was threatening the moral fiber of America. </p>
<p>Anyway, keep up the great  site J&#038;J.</p>
<p>Lmil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FFSteve</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19649</link>
		<dc:creator>FFSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2004 18:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19649</guid>
		<description>Good job Julie.
I agree that the quote needed to be changed.
I wouldn&#039;t have been able to tell if the original comment was a compliment or a complaint.
And good job to the author of the article for the rest of the info which I thought was very balanced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job Julie.<br />
I agree that the quote needed to be changed.<br />
I wouldn&#8217;t have been able to tell if the original comment was a compliment or a complaint.<br />
And good job to the author of the article for the rest of the info which I thought was very balanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19648</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2004 16:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19648</guid>
		<description>Actually, I thought that passage was a little tasteless, so I edited it. If you actually meant that the unit fails the creak test, let me know and I&#039;ll edit your article once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I thought that passage was a little tasteless, so I edited it. If you actually meant that the unit fails the creak test, let me know and I&#8217;ll edit your article once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lmilovy</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19647</link>
		<dc:creator>lmilovy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2004 15:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19647</guid>
		<description>I thought this was pretty funny, this is what was Julie posted to the site....

And although the Tungsten C is quite large compared to many PDA’s, particularly the Tungsten T3, if it were smaller it would make input much more difficult. It’s an acceptable tradeoff for having a Palm you can quickly input data into,  &lt;span&gt;and in any case passes Julie’s legendary creak test with flying colors.&lt;/span&gt;  

This was my original text....

&lt;span&gt;and in any case passes Julie’s legendary creak test like a drunken cheerleader into a frat house&lt;/span&gt; 

I find all this highly amusing. :) My best guess is that Julie had seen Revenge of the Nerds IV the night before on cable, and was keenly aware of the hijinks that can happen when actual drunken cheerleaders enter a frat house. Those hooligan Tri-lams. :)

Lmil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was pretty funny, this is what was Julie posted to the site&#8230;.</p>
<p>And although the Tungsten C is quite large compared to many PDA’s, particularly the Tungsten T3, if it were smaller it would make input much more difficult. It’s an acceptable tradeoff for having a Palm you can quickly input data into,  <span>and in any case passes Julie’s legendary creak test with flying colors.</span>  </p>
<p>This was my original text&#8230;.</p>
<p><span>and in any case passes Julie’s legendary creak test like a drunken cheerleader into a frat house</span> </p>
<p>I find all this highly amusing. <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  My best guess is that Julie had seen Revenge of the Nerds IV the night before on cable, and was keenly aware of the hijinks that can happen when actual drunken cheerleaders enter a frat house. Those hooligan Tri-lams. <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Lmil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thsu</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19646</link>
		<dc:creator>thsu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2004 00:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19646</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.palmgear.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=software.showsoftware&amp;SID=8B43154E-CF18-ADC9-17B573EA4227816E&amp;PartnerREF=&amp;prodID=96&quot;&gt;http://www.palmgear.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=software.showsoftware&amp;SID=8B43154E-CF18-ADC9-17B573EA4227816E&amp;PartnerREF=&amp;prodID=96&lt;/a&gt;

I use an earlier version of this program, and it&#039;s the best out there. Just punch in your pass phrase, and viola, a fully encrypted, searchable memo pad replacement. I consider this an indispensible app, and it&#039;s one of the few reasons I still use my Palm. There&#039;s even a desktop side too, although the desktop app is not nearly as useful as the Palm version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.palmgear.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=software.showsoftware&#038;SID=8B43154E-CF18-ADC9-17B573EA4227816E&#038;PartnerREF=&#038;prodID=96">http://www.palmgear.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=software.showsoftware&#038;SID=8B43154E-CF18-ADC9-17B573EA4227816E&#038;PartnerREF=&#038;prodID=96</a></p>
<p>I use an earlier version of this program, and it&#8217;s the best out there. Just punch in your pass phrase, and viola, a fully encrypted, searchable memo pad replacement. I consider this an indispensible app, and it&#8217;s one of the few reasons I still use my Palm. There&#8217;s even a desktop side too, although the desktop app is not nearly as useful as the Palm version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ianjd</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19645</link>
		<dc:creator>ianjd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2004 17:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19645</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with the thrust of the review. Despite teething problems with the early TCs, the one I ended up with turned out to be a real workhorse, despite my efforts to replace it with the TT3 and Treo600.

One thing worth noting is that there is an adaptor I use that converts the TC audio into a regular earphone socket, eg...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=106199&amp;asource=TUNGSTENC&quot;&gt;http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=106199&amp;asource=TUNGSTENC&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with the thrust of the review. Despite teething problems with the early TCs, the one I ended up with turned out to be a real workhorse, despite my efforts to replace it with the TT3 and Treo600.</p>
<p>One thing worth noting is that there is an adaptor I use that converts the TC audio into a regular earphone socket, eg&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=106199&#038;asource=TUNGSTENC">http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=106199&#038;asource=TUNGSTENC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mas90guru</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19644</link>
		<dc:creator>mas90guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2004 14:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19644</guid>
		<description>I echo your audible comments. I loved the service. Hated having to tap dance through the copy protection and bugs. Cancelled. I much rather purchase the content on CD so I have it handy in cas of a system crash (I know Audible let&#039;s you re-download - but my whole experience was very negative and I jumped ship).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I echo your audible comments. I loved the service. Hated having to tap dance through the copy protection and bugs. Cancelled. I much rather purchase the content on CD so I have it handy in cas of a system crash (I know Audible let&#8217;s you re-download &#8211; but my whole experience was very negative and I jumped ship).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2004/05/14/yearlong_look_back_at_the_tungsten_c_article/comment-page-1/#comment-19643</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2004 03:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19643</guid>
		<description>Post your comments here on the Afterthoughts: A Yearlong Look back at the Tungsten&#124;C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post your comments here on the Afterthoughts: A Yearlong Look back at the Tungsten|C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

