<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kill-A-Watt Electric Usage Monitor Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/</link>
	<description>Gadget reviews and news by Julie Strietelmeier and friends since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:01:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-48673</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-48673</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had a KAW for about 2 weeks.  I first used it to measure a 35 year old chest freezer that I found was using over 1600 kWh a year!  I replaced it last week and after 2 days the new one has used .20 kWh (35 kWh per year).  If you assume a cost of $.09 which seems common then I will save 1565 x $.09 = $140 per year and I get the cost of my $600 freezer back in 4 years.  My new freezer is rated at 357 kWh per year which is 10 times what I measured with my KAW but it seems to only draw about 80 watts when running and won&#039;t run often if kept full and closed. Even if I use the entire 357 kWh as per the rating, I save about $112 a year for a payback period of less than 6 years.

I also measured my 5 year old desktop computer which draws about 190 watts.  It drops to about 10 watts when powered down and only to 0 if unplugged.  I have an Asus netbook that draws about 13 watts when plugged and running on AC.  Now I tend to shut off my desktop most of the time except when I want to do some more serious surfing, email, or when updating files I want to keep secure (I have USB backup drives for the desktop.  I use the netbook to check email or stock markets throughout the day, saving about 160 watts per hour.  It also shows the value of shutting off the PC when not in use.  When mine goes into &quot;standby&quot; it still sucks up 145 watts (the saving is mostly the LCD monitor in save mode).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a KAW for about 2 weeks.  I first used it to measure a 35 year old chest freezer that I found was using over 1600 kWh a year!  I replaced it last week and after 2 days the new one has used .20 kWh (35 kWh per year).  If you assume a cost of $.09 which seems common then I will save 1565 x $.09 = $140 per year and I get the cost of my $600 freezer back in 4 years.  My new freezer is rated at 357 kWh per year which is 10 times what I measured with my KAW but it seems to only draw about 80 watts when running and won&#8217;t run often if kept full and closed. Even if I use the entire 357 kWh as per the rating, I save about $112 a year for a payback period of less than 6 years.</p>
<p>I also measured my 5 year old desktop computer which draws about 190 watts.  It drops to about 10 watts when powered down and only to 0 if unplugged.  I have an Asus netbook that draws about 13 watts when plugged and running on AC.  Now I tend to shut off my desktop most of the time except when I want to do some more serious surfing, email, or when updating files I want to keep secure (I have USB backup drives for the desktop.  I use the netbook to check email or stock markets throughout the day, saving about 160 watts per hour.  It also shows the value of shutting off the PC when not in use.  When mine goes into &#8220;standby&#8221; it still sucks up 145 watts (the saving is mostly the LCD monitor in save mode).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillaume</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-47841</link>
		<dc:creator>Guillaume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47841</guid>
		<description>HM/Stehen

Love hearing two smart people talking. So much bullshit around these days.

It sound like a useful device that is pretty accurate, and for $25, I&#039;d buy a couple. I&#039;m an EE and and an ex-physics grad, so I do understand all of the basics, but its a PITA that folks who build the appartments where I live (Hong Kong), and most of the appartments in Asia pay no attention whatsoever to energy conservation. 

Out here, the main problem is heat. If its 30C all year round, then the main cost of life after paying the rent (building) and food is the cooling, ..the aircon!I have a batchelor falt that is little more than 200 square feet, but all the aircon can do is keep it dry and one or two degrees less than the outside air temperature. That means an appartment ambient of more than 27C for 6 months of the year with the aircon full on.

Compare that to a house I have in Europe that was 2,500 square feet? Bizarre thing was that was cheaper $ for $. Cheaper to cool 2,0500 square feet than 200 degC by degC. So the Hong Kong style buildings where it is just pure concrete with zero insulation, are costing me $100 a month instead of $10 per month.

When I complain to my landlord, he can use a weak excuses: &quot;You leave the lights on to much(Yes, but all are fluorescent)&quot;, &quot;You cook a lot at home (true, but microwave covers half of it, and there the consumption is almost nil if you average it out over a year). I can just here the idiots saying &quot;you don&#039;t realise how much your TV costs &quot;(zero, I don&#039;t have a TV), &quot;and the cooking&quot; (2KW at say 1 hour per day, I can calculate that pretty easiily).

If I look at the real answers, I can estimate, roughly (+- 5%), that cooking is about 10%. Aircon is about 85%. The rest is the bits and pieces, mostly PC related. Lighting is irrelevant when flourescent tubes or bulbs are used.

At least when the idiots say &quot;you consume to much, you should be careful&quot;, then I can wave the $25 box in the air and say &quot;That&#039;s wrong, I have the proof on spreadsheet, next question?&quot;

Commons sense and a bit of learning helps a lot. But, in the end, a black box can talk harder!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HM/Stehen</p>
<p>Love hearing two smart people talking. So much bullshit around these days.</p>
<p>It sound like a useful device that is pretty accurate, and for $25, I&#8217;d buy a couple. I&#8217;m an EE and and an ex-physics grad, so I do understand all of the basics, but its a PITA that folks who build the appartments where I live (Hong Kong), and most of the appartments in Asia pay no attention whatsoever to energy conservation. </p>
<p>Out here, the main problem is heat. If its 30C all year round, then the main cost of life after paying the rent (building) and food is the cooling, ..the aircon!I have a batchelor falt that is little more than 200 square feet, but all the aircon can do is keep it dry and one or two degrees less than the outside air temperature. That means an appartment ambient of more than 27C for 6 months of the year with the aircon full on.</p>
<p>Compare that to a house I have in Europe that was 2,500 square feet? Bizarre thing was that was cheaper $ for $. Cheaper to cool 2,0500 square feet than 200 degC by degC. So the Hong Kong style buildings where it is just pure concrete with zero insulation, are costing me $100 a month instead of $10 per month.</p>
<p>When I complain to my landlord, he can use a weak excuses: &#8220;You leave the lights on to much(Yes, but all are fluorescent)&#8221;, &#8220;You cook a lot at home (true, but microwave covers half of it, and there the consumption is almost nil if you average it out over a year). I can just here the idiots saying &#8220;you don&#8217;t realise how much your TV costs &#8220;(zero, I don&#8217;t have a TV), &#8220;and the cooking&#8221; (2KW at say 1 hour per day, I can calculate that pretty easiily).</p>
<p>If I look at the real answers, I can estimate, roughly (+- 5%), that cooking is about 10%. Aircon is about 85%. The rest is the bits and pieces, mostly PC related. Lighting is irrelevant when flourescent tubes or bulbs are used.</p>
<p>At least when the idiots say &#8220;you consume to much, you should be careful&#8221;, then I can wave the $25 box in the air and say &#8220;That&#8217;s wrong, I have the proof on spreadsheet, next question?&#8221;</p>
<p>Commons sense and a bit of learning helps a lot. But, in the end, a black box can talk harder!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hm</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-39087</link>
		<dc:creator>Hm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-39087</guid>
		<description>Stephen -- 

That&#039;s not obtuse at all, it&#039;s smart. While it doesn&#039;t give you a number, it costs $0, no s/h, no packaging, no manual and no fishing it out of the closet.  It&#039;s also a good way to determine whether to bother unplugging wall-warts etc. 
I recall a quick-thinking tech who used that method to check if a router was bad. The wall-wart was cold, which led us to isolate the problem in another 30 seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen &#8212; </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not obtuse at all, it&#8217;s smart. While it doesn&#8217;t give you a number, it costs $0, no s/h, no packaging, no manual and no fishing it out of the closet.  It&#8217;s also a good way to determine whether to bother unplugging wall-warts etc.<br />
I recall a quick-thinking tech who used that method to check if a router was bad. The wall-wart was cold, which led us to isolate the problem in another 30 seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-37959</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-37959</guid>
		<description>A more obtuse way of figuring what&#039;s wasting energy is just to get a feel for how much heat its creating. The energy used can&#039;t just disappear. Some of it may get turned into light, or kinetic energy but ultimately that will end up as heat as well. For example my fridge is actively blowing hot air out from underneath so its definitely a power hog. An incandescent light bulb cools passively with a small surface area, but its still too hot too touch. My old laptop charger cable had a converter on it that got searing hot so it was probably wasting as much energy as a low wattage light bulb, my new one gets lukewarm so it must be more efficient. Etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A more obtuse way of figuring what&#8217;s wasting energy is just to get a feel for how much heat its creating. The energy used can&#8217;t just disappear. Some of it may get turned into light, or kinetic energy but ultimately that will end up as heat as well. For example my fridge is actively blowing hot air out from underneath so its definitely a power hog. An incandescent light bulb cools passively with a small surface area, but its still too hot too touch. My old laptop charger cable had a converter on it that got searing hot so it was probably wasting as much energy as a low wattage light bulb, my new one gets lukewarm so it must be more efficient. Etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Empie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-37583</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Empie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-37583</guid>
		<description>Bought a Kill-a-watt.

My Dell laptop pulls 27 watts when charging.
My Dell PC with 17 inch flat screen monitor and 2 internal hard drives and one external hard drive pulls 130 watts on average.
At work I took a 22&quot; flat screen monitor and plugged into the Kill-a-watt and it only pulled 26 watts at medium brightness.

I love this thing!!!  Also at home depot you can get an amp meter that you can put around the black lead on your large appliances--at the breaker box.  You can the figure out how much it pulls at that moment, not over time like the Kill-a-watt but should give you an idea.  Experienced persons only, don&#039;t mess with your breaker box otherwise!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought a Kill-a-watt.</p>
<p>My Dell laptop pulls 27 watts when charging.<br />
My Dell PC with 17 inch flat screen monitor and 2 internal hard drives and one external hard drive pulls 130 watts on average.<br />
At work I took a 22&#8243; flat screen monitor and plugged into the Kill-a-watt and it only pulled 26 watts at medium brightness.</p>
<p>I love this thing!!!  Also at home depot you can get an amp meter that you can put around the black lead on your large appliances&#8211;at the breaker box.  You can the figure out how much it pulls at that moment, not over time like the Kill-a-watt but should give you an idea.  Experienced persons only, don&#8217;t mess with your breaker box otherwise!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-33703</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-33703</guid>
		<description>Warranty on this unit is only 6 months.  It&#039;s not well posted by the reseller sites (but it&#039;s in the manual).  Many many positive reviews for the product but on any item like this it&#039;s often important to pay attention to those that claim it is often inaccurate or loses accuracy as time goes on.  I am not claiming those things but after all the effectiveness of this product is lost if the readings can&#039;t be trusted.  

It&#039;s an affordable product but to me is like a portable Breath alcohol content analyzer - When calibrated and working within specs its a good &quot;guide&quot;...but never admissible in court as fact as a booking stations much more expensive well calibrated machine is...  So if you find a troubling reading might need a second opinion.

P.S. they have had a newer model out for a couple of years now that has a battery back up (for memory) so you don&#039;t loose data if unplugged etc.  P4460 but I dont&#039; think they fixed the display / lighting issue and it&#039;s about $20 more.

P.S.S. Earth to Jim... you aren&#039;t supposed to keep this thing plugged in for 365 X 24hrs a day to test a night light (you can accurately test a night light in an hours time as it&#039;s a constant power draw)...  BTW, I just replaced my night lights with .3 Watt LED versions - Much more light and less than 1 Watt of power.  Jim my night lights also &quot;claim&quot; 4 watts but some drew more than 8 Watts.  
And that&#039;s so true of many items Jim; like TVs list &quot;MAX&quot; wattage.  Because they can&#039;t possibly know the true power draw once a TV is configured.  So a 200 Watt Max rated LCD Big screen might actually use 120 Watts during the day and less at night when the Brightness is turned down to a lower but excellent viewing level... You can&#039;t just read the ambiguous labels they put on an appliance and expect it to be accurate for all of them...or to account for appliances such as a refridgerator or an AC unit that can cost more as they age/become dirty.  

Most of the time these meters should stay unplugged.  BTW I didn&#039;t buy TWO meters to test the second one but the 10Watts listed is MAX wattage...If your comments weren&#039;t so silly I&#039;d pull out my voltage meter and find out exactly what&#039;s it&#039;s drawing just to say nana boo boo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warranty on this unit is only 6 months.  It&#8217;s not well posted by the reseller sites (but it&#8217;s in the manual).  Many many positive reviews for the product but on any item like this it&#8217;s often important to pay attention to those that claim it is often inaccurate or loses accuracy as time goes on.  I am not claiming those things but after all the effectiveness of this product is lost if the readings can&#8217;t be trusted.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s an affordable product but to me is like a portable Breath alcohol content analyzer &#8211; When calibrated and working within specs its a good &#8220;guide&#8221;&#8230;but never admissible in court as fact as a booking stations much more expensive well calibrated machine is&#8230;  So if you find a troubling reading might need a second opinion.</p>
<p>P.S. they have had a newer model out for a couple of years now that has a battery back up (for memory) so you don&#8217;t loose data if unplugged etc.  P4460 but I dont&#8217; think they fixed the display / lighting issue and it&#8217;s about $20 more.</p>
<p>P.S.S. Earth to Jim&#8230; you aren&#8217;t supposed to keep this thing plugged in for 365 X 24hrs a day to test a night light (you can accurately test a night light in an hours time as it&#8217;s a constant power draw)&#8230;  BTW, I just replaced my night lights with .3 Watt LED versions &#8211; Much more light and less than 1 Watt of power.  Jim my night lights also &#8220;claim&#8221; 4 watts but some drew more than 8 Watts.<br />
And that&#8217;s so true of many items Jim; like TVs list &#8220;MAX&#8221; wattage.  Because they can&#8217;t possibly know the true power draw once a TV is configured.  So a 200 Watt Max rated LCD Big screen might actually use 120 Watts during the day and less at night when the Brightness is turned down to a lower but excellent viewing level&#8230; You can&#8217;t just read the ambiguous labels they put on an appliance and expect it to be accurate for all of them&#8230;or to account for appliances such as a refridgerator or an AC unit that can cost more as they age/become dirty.  </p>
<p>Most of the time these meters should stay unplugged.  BTW I didn&#8217;t buy TWO meters to test the second one but the 10Watts listed is MAX wattage&#8230;If your comments weren&#8217;t so silly I&#8217;d pull out my voltage meter and find out exactly what&#8217;s it&#8217;s drawing just to say nana boo boo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twogiraffe</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-32974</link>
		<dc:creator>twogiraffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-32974</guid>
		<description>Reply to smhse. Regarding where the product is made.  Yes, it&#039;s made in China.
So if you are boycotting Chinese made goods, you should not buy this.  And also you may want to throw away half your clothes, and rip out many of the electronic parts that are in your car causing it to be inoperable.  Gut out your TV and computer.  Move to a farm and produce everything on your own.  Do not shop at grocery stores as many of the foods produced and shipped use equipment and electronics from China.  Good luck.  

Regarding the product... I&#039;m going to buy one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reply to smhse. Regarding where the product is made.  Yes, it&#8217;s made in China.<br />
So if you are boycotting Chinese made goods, you should not buy this.  And also you may want to throw away half your clothes, and rip out many of the electronic parts that are in your car causing it to be inoperable.  Gut out your TV and computer.  Move to a farm and produce everything on your own.  Do not shop at grocery stores as many of the foods produced and shipped use equipment and electronics from China.  Good luck.  </p>
<p>Regarding the product&#8230; I&#8217;m going to buy one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-30031</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-30031</guid>
		<description>Has anyone made a list of common appliances/devices and there average cost?

 I want to know what an oil furnace burner costs to run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone made a list of common appliances/devices and there average cost?</p>
<p> I want to know what an oil furnace burner costs to run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom hudson</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-28670</link>
		<dc:creator>tom hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-28670</guid>
		<description>To HRhotrod: Probably the other half of your energy usage is in such things as water heater, range, clothes dryer, other laundry equipment, lamps and ceiling lights, doorbell transformer, cable boxes or modems, electric clocks and of course heat and AC. Your heat and AC also have tranformers which are &quot;on&quot; constantly so that the units can respond to the thermostat.

As another reader mentioned, there are many things that even when not turned on, are not technically &quot;off&quot;, because they&#039;re in standby mode, just waiting to be powered up by remote control or the push of a button. Most of these devices can be unplugged or connected to a switched power strip. The biggest money savers for me were replacing fitting the lights I use most often and for long periods of time, with compact flourescent bulbs AND using an outdoor clothesline in good weather.

Also bear in mind that today&#039;s detergents are formulated to work just as well in cold water as in warm or hot. Water heaters gobble up lots of electricity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To HRhotrod: Probably the other half of your energy usage is in such things as water heater, range, clothes dryer, other laundry equipment, lamps and ceiling lights, doorbell transformer, cable boxes or modems, electric clocks and of course heat and AC. Your heat and AC also have tranformers which are &#8220;on&#8221; constantly so that the units can respond to the thermostat.</p>
<p>As another reader mentioned, there are many things that even when not turned on, are not technically &#8220;off&#8221;, because they&#8217;re in standby mode, just waiting to be powered up by remote control or the push of a button. Most of these devices can be unplugged or connected to a switched power strip. The biggest money savers for me were replacing fitting the lights I use most often and for long periods of time, with compact flourescent bulbs AND using an outdoor clothesline in good weather.</p>
<p>Also bear in mind that today&#8217;s detergents are formulated to work just as well in cold water as in warm or hot. Water heaters gobble up lots of electricity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prinler</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-28218</link>
		<dc:creator>Prinler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-28218</guid>
		<description>Wow Jim, your a nut case. 
Im going to buy one just because you said that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Jim, your a nut case.<br />
Im going to buy one just because you said that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim F</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18865</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18865</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Keep in mind that the manual for the Kill-A-Watt indicates that you should let your tests run for a &quot;period of time&quot; (&quot;the longer, the better&quot;) to get a &quot;true indication&quot; of actual usage of an appliance, which means that such appliances that cycle on and off could take up to a month to determine an accurate power consumption rate, in order for you to see how much energy you&#039;re using in a year. So, depending on how many items you have to test in your home (and how many others you buy throughout the year and test when you bring them home), it may take you almost a year to find out how much it&#039;s costing you. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Upon reading the users manual for the Kill-A-Watt EZ P4460, it indicates that it uses 10Watts, which comes to 87.6KWH per year. At a low rate of 14-cents/KWH (in my area), that comes to 12.26/year. 
(Reference: http://www.ccrane.com/instruction-manuals/kill-a-watt-ez-P4460.pdf - I couldn&#039;t find the power consumption info for the P4400)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, to find out that your microwave oven display clock is costing you $2/year or a 4W night-light is costing you $3/year or that your 5W desk lamp is costing you $6 year (if these were all left on 24/7), you have used more power trying to determine how much you can save, than it cost you to determine the costs of those units. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When you&#039;re doing your cost analysis, don&#039;t forget to add in the $20-$40 cost of the unit... after all, those pennies add up. Has anyone asked how much energy  the manufacturer is using in a year, to build these units? How much is this adding to the &quot;greenhouse effect&quot; on the Earth&#039;s environment. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And while we&#039;re calculating the costs to the consumer... it would be interesting to find out if the company received any federal grants to design &amp; build the device and if they get tax credits/deductions for their contribution of an energy-saving device. If so, then we would have to determine how much this is costing the average taxpayer each year. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How much would we all save if we threw out our computers? Instead of sitting here reading about how much energy we could save by buying one of these units and unplugging our microwave or toaster when not in use. Of course, that would lead to more landfill rubbish and the environmental problems that would cause... and the cycle continues... I guess we&#039;re doomed?  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind that the manual for the Kill-A-Watt indicates that you should let your tests run for a &#8220;period of time&#8221; (&#8221;the longer, the better&#8221;) to get a &#8220;true indication&#8221; of actual usage of an appliance, which means that such appliances that cycle on and off could take up to a month to determine an accurate power consumption rate, in order for you to see how much energy you&#8217;re using in a year. So, depending on how many items you have to test in your home (and how many others you buy throughout the year and test when you bring them home), it may take you almost a year to find out how much it&#8217;s costing you. </p>
<p>Upon reading the users manual for the Kill-A-Watt EZ P4460, it indicates that it uses 10Watts, which comes to 87.6KWH per year. At a low rate of 14-cents/KWH (in my area), that comes to 12.26/year.<br />
(Reference: <a href="http://www.ccrane.com/instruction-manuals/kill-a-watt-ez-P4460.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ccrane.com/instruction-manuals/kill-a-watt-ez-P4460.pdf</a> &#8211; I couldn&#8217;t find the power consumption info for the P4400)</p>
<p>So, to find out that your microwave oven display clock is costing you $2/year or a 4W night-light is costing you $3/year or that your 5W desk lamp is costing you $6 year (if these were all left on 24/7), you have used more power trying to determine how much you can save, than it cost you to determine the costs of those units. </p>
<p>When you&#8217;re doing your cost analysis, don&#8217;t forget to add in the $20-$40 cost of the unit&#8230; after all, those pennies add up. Has anyone asked how much energy  the manufacturer is using in a year, to build these units? How much is this adding to the &#8220;greenhouse effect&#8221; on the Earth&#8217;s environment. </p>
<p>And while we&#8217;re calculating the costs to the consumer&#8230; it would be interesting to find out if the company received any federal grants to design &amp; build the device and if they get tax credits/deductions for their contribution of an energy-saving device. If so, then we would have to determine how much this is costing the average taxpayer each year. </p>
<p>How much would we all save if we threw out our computers? Instead of sitting here reading about how much energy we could save by buying one of these units and unplugging our microwave or toaster when not in use. Of course, that would lead to more landfill rubbish and the environmental problems that would cause&#8230; and the cycle continues&#8230; I guess we&#8217;re doomed?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HRhotrod</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18890</link>
		<dc:creator>HRhotrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18890</guid>
		<description>Judie:

1
Kill-a-Watt is a GREAT product. Simple to use. Not cluttered. Like Einstein said: &quot;something should be simple, but not too simple.&quot; 

2
GREAT price point.

3
PROBLEM. I can only find ~1/2 the KWH on my bill. I have detailed my regrigerators&#039; usage, my waterbed heater, my PCs, my displays, my cable box, my projector, each carefully weighted by time usage. Now I&#039;m worried that there may be a meter innacuracy or a short somewhere. I know that this segway is off topic -- but I&#039;d appreciate your pointing me to any relevant forums.

4
I love the gadgeteer. It has helped my choose several PPC purchases, etc.


Thanks! 
Henry Robbins</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judie:</p>
<p>1<br />
Kill-a-Watt is a GREAT product. Simple to use. Not cluttered. Like Einstein said: &#8220;something should be simple, but not too simple.&#8221; </p>
<p>2<br />
GREAT price point.</p>
<p>3<br />
PROBLEM. I can only find ~1/2 the KWH on my bill. I have detailed my regrigerators&#8217; usage, my waterbed heater, my PCs, my displays, my cable box, my projector, each carefully weighted by time usage. Now I&#8217;m worried that there may be a meter innacuracy or a short somewhere. I know that this segway is off topic &#8212; but I&#8217;d appreciate your pointing me to any relevant forums.</p>
<p>4<br />
I love the gadgeteer. It has helped my choose several PPC purchases, etc.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Henry Robbins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oxmon</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18889</link>
		<dc:creator>oxmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18889</guid>
		<description>The concept and the function of a watt meter is great. But can you trust the reading from this meter?

The reviewer observed that &quot;At 3:30pm, my KWH read 0.06 and the cumulative time displayed was 2:00 hours.&quot; for the TV during ON state.

This reading doesn&#039;t sound believable. It indicates that each hour the TV runs like a mere 30W light bulb (0.06 KWH means 0.06 kilowatt hour or 60 watt hour, so divide by 2 hours, it means 30 watt power rating). Remember this was not measured when the TV is off, but when it was working.

Maybe should go for more expensive brands?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concept and the function of a watt meter is great. But can you trust the reading from this meter?</p>
<p>The reviewer observed that &#8220;At 3:30pm, my KWH read 0.06 and the cumulative time displayed was 2:00 hours.&#8221; for the TV during ON state.</p>
<p>This reading doesn&#8217;t sound believable. It indicates that each hour the TV runs like a mere 30W light bulb (0.06 KWH means 0.06 kilowatt hour or 60 watt hour, so divide by 2 hours, it means 30 watt power rating). Remember this was not measured when the TV is off, but when it was working.</p>
<p>Maybe should go for more expensive brands?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: x31forest</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18888</link>
		<dc:creator>x31forest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18888</guid>
		<description>If you have any readings that you&#039;d like to share, I&#039;d appreciate it if you can add them to &lt;a href=&quot;&quot; /&gt;http://www.thewattdb.com&lt;/a&gt; .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have any readings that you&#8217;d like to share, I&#8217;d appreciate it if you can add them to <a href="" />http://www.thewattdb.com .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smhse</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18887</link>
		<dc:creator>smhse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 02:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18887</guid>
		<description>I just have one question...Is this device made here in the U.S.A or in Communist China?  If it is the later, then I&#039;m not buying it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just have one question&#8230;Is this device made here in the U.S.A or in Communist China?  If it is the later, then I&#8217;m not buying it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skytag</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18886</link>
		<dc:creator>skytag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18886</guid>
		<description>[QUOTE=Judie]I thought it was &lt;strong&gt;bad&lt;/strong&gt; for an AC to run the whole time, I thought it meant it was either overtaxed or gobbling electricity. I could kick myself for getting a bigger unit than we probably needed last year when we had to replace ours (due to hail damage).

Your heating and air company should have advised you not to install a bigger unit than normal. An oversized unit runs less than a correctly sized unit, but that means it spends less time filtering your air and removing humidity. In areas where humidity is an issue (as it is here in central Florida), an oversized unit won&#039;t run enough to control the humidity and even when the temperature is right it won&#039;t be comfortable. In fact, I know your post is old at this point, but for other readers who come along late, the modern, top-of-the-line heat pumps now have the ability to run longer with less cooling specifically to do a better job of controlling humidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[QUOTE=Judie]I thought it was <strong>bad</strong> for an AC to run the whole time, I thought it meant it was either overtaxed or gobbling electricity. I could kick myself for getting a bigger unit than we probably needed last year when we had to replace ours (due to hail damage).</p>
<p>Your heating and air company should have advised you not to install a bigger unit than normal. An oversized unit runs less than a correctly sized unit, but that means it spends less time filtering your air and removing humidity. In areas where humidity is an issue (as it is here in central Florida), an oversized unit won&#8217;t run enough to control the humidity and even when the temperature is right it won&#8217;t be comfortable. In fact, I know your post is old at this point, but for other readers who come along late, the modern, top-of-the-line heat pumps now have the ability to run longer with less cooling specifically to do a better job of controlling humidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogre</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18885</link>
		<dc:creator>Ogre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18885</guid>
		<description>I am trying to determine why my KWH usage is so high.  I understand that the price per KWH has soared over the past year but I am hoping to rule out the 110 volt appliances around the house before I call in a high $$$ electrician.  So far, I have narrowed the cause down to my heat pump.  I was able to just about rule out the hot  water tank by monitoring the amps used on each hot lead going to the tank.  Unfortunately, that involved watching the load for 15 minutes and manually timing the duration of usage.

I agree that the KAW meter is a great tool for monitoring my appliances, but I think that a simple users&#039; manual would be very helpful.  It seems very straight forward for an appliance that is operating at full load while you are monitoring the flow of electricity to it.  However, I don&#039;t think that the usage is as clear cut for an appliance, such as a dehumidifer, that creates a load periodically.

I&#039;m guessing that to calulate an average KW per Hour, you must divide the recorded KWH by the recording time span.  Am I correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to determine why my KWH usage is so high.  I understand that the price per KWH has soared over the past year but I am hoping to rule out the 110 volt appliances around the house before I call in a high $$$ electrician.  So far, I have narrowed the cause down to my heat pump.  I was able to just about rule out the hot  water tank by monitoring the amps used on each hot lead going to the tank.  Unfortunately, that involved watching the load for 15 minutes and manually timing the duration of usage.</p>
<p>I agree that the KAW meter is a great tool for monitoring my appliances, but I think that a simple users&#8217; manual would be very helpful.  It seems very straight forward for an appliance that is operating at full load while you are monitoring the flow of electricity to it.  However, I don&#8217;t think that the usage is as clear cut for an appliance, such as a dehumidifer, that creates a load periodically.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing that to calulate an average KW per Hour, you must divide the recorded KWH by the recording time span.  Am I correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: royc</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18884</link>
		<dc:creator>royc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 14:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18884</guid>
		<description>Interesting read on that gadget.  The test you did on the refigerator needs to be longer then 1 hour.  The reason for that is, the defrost cycle has to be included in your calculation of how much it costs, and adds a lot to the total cost of running it.

Since I own a HVAC and Appliance business that gadget has peaked my interest, need to get one..lol

Also someone mentioned it not working on a modified sine wave converter, let me state to anyone thats interested in such a device, I highly reccomend a full sine wave converter unless your only interested in some basic electric usage.  Many devices you would plug in to a wall socket will not work properly, including many of the wallwart chargers, and may damage the equipment your trying to charge.

There is a good reason why full sinewave inverters are more expensive.

Roy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read on that gadget.  The test you did on the refigerator needs to be longer then 1 hour.  The reason for that is, the defrost cycle has to be included in your calculation of how much it costs, and adds a lot to the total cost of running it.</p>
<p>Since I own a HVAC and Appliance business that gadget has peaked my interest, need to get one..lol</p>
<p>Also someone mentioned it not working on a modified sine wave converter, let me state to anyone thats interested in such a device, I highly reccomend a full sine wave converter unless your only interested in some basic electric usage.  Many devices you would plug in to a wall socket will not work properly, including many of the wallwart chargers, and may damage the equipment your trying to charge.</p>
<p>There is a good reason why full sinewave inverters are more expensive.</p>
<p>Roy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18883</link>
		<dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18883</guid>
		<description>Hey guys, I just looked at the problem, and I see that my terminology was incorrect. Yes, I should have referred to the numbers calculated as dollars, since I was using decimal points (although it made perfect sense to me at the time -ha!). Mea culpa. 

I&#039;ll go back in and correct the review. :0)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, I just looked at the problem, and I see that my terminology was incorrect. Yes, I should have referred to the numbers calculated as dollars, since I was using decimal points (although it made perfect sense to me at the time -ha!). Mea culpa. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll go back in and correct the review. :0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnsoax</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18882</link>
		<dc:creator>johnsoax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18882</guid>
		<description>yep, you seem to be right.  I didn&#039;t catch that mistake earlier :)  The reviewer needs to change the cents an hour to dollars an hour and then they are ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep, you seem to be right.  I didn&#8217;t catch that mistake earlier <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   The reviewer needs to change the cents an hour to dollars an hour and then they are ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frozensun</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18881</link>
		<dc:creator>frozensun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18881</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone.  I just bought this based on this recommendation, and if anyone is watching perhaps they can clarify for me..   My confusion is the calculation that was made.  I&#039;ll quote the text for ease of use...

&lt;blockquote&gt;Through my energy provider (TXU), I pay an average of 9.17 cents per KWH (excluding taxes and non-recurring charges or credits).&lt;/blockquote&gt;
So to make it look like my bill I would convert that to dollars: $0.0917

&lt;blockquote&gt;At the end of my test period, I found that I had used 0.06 KWH for two hours.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
0.06 KWH / 2 = 0.03 KWH used on average..

&lt;blockquote&gt;At this rate, it costs me 0.002751 cents an hour, or 0.005502 cents to run this TV for two hours a day (my average usage).&lt;/blockquote&gt;
So this is where I got lost.  When I do the calc, I get

$0.0917 * 0.03 KWH = $0.002751 = 0.2751 cents an hour, does it not?

 &lt;blockquote&gt;Per week, I pay 0.038514 cents,&lt;/blockquote&gt;
$0.002751 * 14 hours = $0.038514 = 3.8514 cents a week

&lt;blockquote&gt;per month 0.1673525 cents,&lt;/blockquote&gt;
$0.002751 * 2 hours * 30.4166 days = $0.167352 = 16.7352 cents a month

&lt;blockquote&gt;and per year, the total would be $2.01 - at the rate of two hours usage per day.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
$0.002751 * 2 hours * 30.4166 days * 12 = $2.01

Can someone check me?  To me it seems like the yearly calculation was correct, but everything was quoted as being in cents rather than dollars?  I guess after going through this post just now I think my confusion was when he said 0.002751 cents an hour, I&#039;m thinking a 2/100th of a cent, not $0.002751 which is 2/100th of a dollar...  I can see how other people could be confused too..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone.  I just bought this based on this recommendation, and if anyone is watching perhaps they can clarify for me..   My confusion is the calculation that was made.  I&#8217;ll quote the text for ease of use&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Through my energy provider (TXU), I pay an average of 9.17 cents per KWH (excluding taxes and non-recurring charges or credits).</p></blockquote>
<p>So to make it look like my bill I would convert that to dollars: $0.0917</p>
<blockquote><p>At the end of my test period, I found that I had used 0.06 KWH for two hours.</p></blockquote>
<p>0.06 KWH / 2 = 0.03 KWH used on average..</p>
<blockquote><p>At this rate, it costs me 0.002751 cents an hour, or 0.005502 cents to run this TV for two hours a day (my average usage).</p></blockquote>
<p>So this is where I got lost.  When I do the calc, I get</p>
<p>$0.0917 * 0.03 KWH = $0.002751 = 0.2751 cents an hour, does it not?</p>
<blockquote><p>Per week, I pay 0.038514 cents,</p></blockquote>
<p>$0.002751 * 14 hours = $0.038514 = 3.8514 cents a week</p>
<blockquote><p>per month 0.1673525 cents,</p></blockquote>
<p>$0.002751 * 2 hours * 30.4166 days = $0.167352 = 16.7352 cents a month</p>
<blockquote><p>and per year, the total would be $2.01 &#8211; at the rate of two hours usage per day.</p></blockquote>
<p>$0.002751 * 2 hours * 30.4166 days * 12 = $2.01</p>
<p>Can someone check me?  To me it seems like the yearly calculation was correct, but everything was quoted as being in cents rather than dollars?  I guess after going through this post just now I think my confusion was when he said 0.002751 cents an hour, I&#8217;m thinking a 2/100th of a cent, not $0.002751 which is 2/100th of a dollar&#8230;  I can see how other people could be confused too..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18880</link>
		<dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 01:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18880</guid>
		<description>Thanks Gremlin. :0)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gremlin. :0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gremlin_591002</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18879</link>
		<dc:creator>gremlin_591002</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 01:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18879</guid>
		<description>Ohm&#039;s Law is the big one.  It states that

Watts = Volts * Amps

So, 120V household current * 5 Amps = 600 Watts.  Multiple by the number of hours at 600 watts to get Watt Hours.  A kilowatt hour equals 1000 watt hours.  Remember, your household voltage will rarely be exactly 120.  Lots of houses run 132 or as low as 95.  Amps will fluctuate to make up the difference resulting in the same number of watts.  For example

600 watts / 132 volts = 4.54 amps. or
600 watts / 95 volts = 6.31 amps

It all comes out in the wash.  Assuming your not running some strange frankenstien experiments in you garage, your heating/cooling load will be the biggest energy user in your house.  Followed by your major appliances, then lights, then computers/home entertainment.  Even silly fast computers running seti@home are only going to draw ~300 watts.  Or about 2 light bulbs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohm&#8217;s Law is the big one.  It states that</p>
<p>Watts = Volts * Amps</p>
<p>So, 120V household current * 5 Amps = 600 Watts.  Multiple by the number of hours at 600 watts to get Watt Hours.  A kilowatt hour equals 1000 watt hours.  Remember, your household voltage will rarely be exactly 120.  Lots of houses run 132 or as low as 95.  Amps will fluctuate to make up the difference resulting in the same number of watts.  For example</p>
<p>600 watts / 132 volts = 4.54 amps. or<br />
600 watts / 95 volts = 6.31 amps</p>
<p>It all comes out in the wash.  Assuming your not running some strange frankenstien experiments in you garage, your heating/cooling load will be the biggest energy user in your house.  Followed by your major appliances, then lights, then computers/home entertainment.  Even silly fast computers running seti@home are only going to draw ~300 watts.  Or about 2 light bulbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18878</link>
		<dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 23:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18878</guid>
		<description>Jaye, did you try following the example I gave in my review to figure out what it is costing you? You&#039;ll need a copy of your latest electricity bill to do it. 

Let us know how it goes. :0)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaye, did you try following the example I gave in my review to figure out what it is costing you? You&#8217;ll need a copy of your latest electricity bill to do it. </p>
<p>Let us know how it goes. :0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaye580</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18877</link>
		<dc:creator>jaye580</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 22:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18877</guid>
		<description>I just purchased one of these to try to figure out why in the world myelectric bill is so high- I have only used it once for 24 hours on my refrigerator, and now I am starting 24 hours on my sump pump.  The problem I am having is that it really doesn&#039;t come with any instructions.  I know NOTHING about electricity and am a little disappointed that there weren&#039;t any directions explaining how to do the calculations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just purchased one of these to try to figure out why in the world myelectric bill is so high- I have only used it once for 24 hours on my refrigerator, and now I am starting 24 hours on my sump pump.  The problem I am having is that it really doesn&#8217;t come with any instructions.  I know NOTHING about electricity and am a little disappointed that there weren&#8217;t any directions explaining how to do the calculations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
