<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smart ID WiFi Detector Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/03/smart_id_wifi_detector_review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/03/smart_id_wifi_detector_review/</link>
	<description>Gadget reviews and news by Julie Strietelmeier and friends since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:27:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: peter1</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/03/smart_id_wifi_detector_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18799</link>
		<dc:creator>peter1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18799</guid>
		<description>this is quite honestly the most useful thing ever! 
i purchased one from proud fox - 

wifi signal detector
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.proudfox.co.uk/products/wifidetector.html&quot;&gt;http://www.proudfox.co.uk/products/wifidetector.html&lt;/a&gt;


and ive been using it ever since, much easier than booting up my dam laptop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is quite honestly the most useful thing ever!<br />
i purchased one from proud fox &#8211; </p>
<p>wifi signal detector<br />
<a href="http://www.proudfox.co.uk/products/wifidetector.html">http://www.proudfox.co.uk/products/wifidetector.html</a></p>
<p>and ive been using it ever since, much easier than booting up my dam laptop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irni</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/03/smart_id_wifi_detector_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18798</link>
		<dc:creator>irni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2003 02:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18798</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately it also detects 2.4Ghz cordless phones which are quite abundant. I got about a 20% detection to logon ratio when finding usable networks. It is still a cool tool but it really should only detect b/g and that is it. And it should have another LED to let you know if it is G or B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately it also detects 2.4Ghz cordless phones which are quite abundant. I got about a 20% detection to logon ratio when finding usable networks. It is still a cool tool but it really should only detect b/g and that is it. And it should have another LED to let you know if it is G or B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheDreamer</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/03/smart_id_wifi_detector_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18797</link>
		<dc:creator>TheDreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 20:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18797</guid>
		<description>What I want to find is a WiFi detector that tells you more than that it is present....

...such as channel, SSID, WEP key.....:) 

Though I haven&#039;t found such a beast for my Windows notebook yet....:( 

The Dreamer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I want to find is a WiFi detector that tells you more than that it is present&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8230;such as channel, SSID, WEP key&#8230;..:) </p>
<p>Though I haven&#8217;t found such a beast for my Windows notebook yet&#8230;.:( </p>
<p>The Dreamer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/03/smart_id_wifi_detector_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18796</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 18:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18796</guid>
		<description>My Bluetooth tests consisted only of my T&#124;T (I do not have a Bluetooth phone). I would just have the T&#124;T scan for new devices, and would then press the button on the WiFi detector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Bluetooth tests consisted only of my T|T (I do not have a Bluetooth phone). I would just have the T|T scan for new devices, and would then press the button on the WiFi detector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Altema</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/03/smart_id_wifi_detector_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18795</link>
		<dc:creator>Altema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 16:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18795</guid>
		<description>Now THIS is something I can use. Good price too. Although it does not give you any security status or SSID, at least you will know that there IS a signal before you break out your PDA or laptop. I&#039;m curious about the BT sensitivity, have you tried it with something other than your T (like a BT phone)? I know the T radio was not as strong as some others, but three feet seems a little short. I could maintain a BT link for about 10-15 feet on the original T, and about 45-50 feet on the T3. Of course, BT detection would not be a priority, as it would be more convienient to check with your hendheld or phone. The wi-fi would be the big use for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now THIS is something I can use. Good price too. Although it does not give you any security status or SSID, at least you will know that there IS a signal before you break out your PDA or laptop. I&#8217;m curious about the BT sensitivity, have you tried it with something other than your T (like a BT phone)? I know the T radio was not as strong as some others, but three feet seems a little short. I could maintain a BT link for about 10-15 feet on the original T, and about 45-50 feet on the T3. Of course, BT detection would not be a priority, as it would be more convienient to check with your hendheld or phone. The wi-fi would be the big use for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/03/smart_id_wifi_detector_review/comment-page-1/#comment-18794</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 01:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18794</guid>
		<description>Post your comments on the Smart ID WiFi Detector Review.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/smartid-wifi-detector-review.html&quot;&gt;http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/smartid-wifi-detector-review.html&lt;/a&gt;

Just click the POST REPLY button on this page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post your comments on the Smart ID WiFi Detector Review.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/smartid-wifi-detector-review.html">http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/smartid-wifi-detector-review.html</a></p>
<p>Just click the POST REPLY button on this page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
