<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gem Hunter for Pocket PC Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/</link>
	<description>Gadget reviews and news by Julie Strietelmeier and friends since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:50:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15373</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2004 16:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15373</guid>
		<description>GSML:

I&#039;ve been seriously thinking about buying a satellite radio package that I can use in both my car or home. The software that you&#039;ve provided links to look  very interesting! Have you tried the TimeTrax software yourself? If so, what bitrate does it record songs at?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GSML:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been seriously thinking about buying a satellite radio package that I can use in both my car or home. The software that you&#8217;ve provided links to look  very interesting! Have you tried the TimeTrax software yourself? If so, what bitrate does it record songs at?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GSML</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15372</link>
		<dc:creator>GSML</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2004 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15372</guid>
		<description>The software that comes with the XM PCR is somewhat sub-par, but there are lots of third-party packages available that do some amazing things.

XtremePCR is a free alternative to the stock software that does a lot more, and does it better:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xtremepcr.com&quot;&gt;http://www.xtremepcr.com&lt;/a&gt;

Last week TimeTrax came out, it rips MP3&#039;s directly from the satellite radio, with full artist and song names on them. Leave it running overnight and you end up with a directory full of MP3&#039;s.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nerosoft.com/timetrax&quot;&gt;http://www.nerosoft.com/timetrax&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The software that comes with the XM PCR is somewhat sub-par, but there are lots of third-party packages available that do some amazing things.</p>
<p>XtremePCR is a free alternative to the stock software that does a lot more, and does it better:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.xtremepcr.com">http://www.xtremepcr.com</a></p>
<p>Last week TimeTrax came out, it rips MP3&#8242;s directly from the satellite radio, with full artist and song names on them. Leave it running overnight and you end up with a directory full of MP3&#8242;s.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nerosoft.com/timetrax">http://www.nerosoft.com/timetrax</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mwooldri</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15371</link>
		<dc:creator>mwooldri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 00:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15371</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted by mterk &lt;/em&gt;
[B]Does anyone know if XM receives a signal in England?
-Mike [/B]&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As stated earlier:  No. 

Besides, Europe has a good terrestrial digital radio network as well as Worldspace, and other people looking to launch an XM Radio style service too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Originally posted by mterk </em><br />
[B]Does anyone know if XM receives a signal in England?<br />
-Mike [/B]</p></blockquote>
<p>As stated earlier:  No. </p>
<p>Besides, Europe has a good terrestrial digital radio network as well as Worldspace, and other people looking to launch an XM Radio style service too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fitzsimmons</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15370</link>
		<dc:creator>fitzsimmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2003 05:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15370</guid>
		<description>Neither XM nor Sirius work in England.

XM covers the continental US, plus much of Alaska, Canada, Mexico and surrounding waters.

Most of Europe, however, already has satellite radio service.  Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldspace.com&quot;&gt;http://www.worldspace.com&lt;/a&gt;.  Their receivers are a generation ahead of XM&#039;s (and two ahead of Sirius) so you might want to see them just for the coolness factor.  (I particularly like the Hitachi model.)  Worldspace doesn&#039;t have XM&#039;s variety but if you&#039;re an English speaker stuck in the boondocks, I&#039;m told it&#039;s a Godsend.

Also, if I remember correctly, the European Space Agency announced earlier this year that it would be devoting some aging satellites to developing a new commercial European satellite radio service.  (Search on slashdot.com for details.)

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted by mterk &lt;/em&gt;
[B]Does anyone know if XM receives a signal in England?
-Mike [/B]&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither XM nor Sirius work in England.</p>
<p>XM covers the continental US, plus much of Alaska, Canada, Mexico and surrounding waters.</p>
<p>Most of Europe, however, already has satellite radio service.  Check out <a href="http://www.worldspace.com">http://www.worldspace.com</a>.  Their receivers are a generation ahead of XM&#8217;s (and two ahead of Sirius) so you might want to see them just for the coolness factor.  (I particularly like the Hitachi model.)  Worldspace doesn&#8217;t have XM&#8217;s variety but if you&#8217;re an English speaker stuck in the boondocks, I&#8217;m told it&#8217;s a Godsend.</p>
<p>Also, if I remember correctly, the European Space Agency announced earlier this year that it would be devoting some aging satellites to developing a new commercial European satellite radio service.  (Search on slashdot.com for details.)</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Originally posted by mterk </em><br />
[B]Does anyone know if XM receives a signal in England?<br />
-Mike [/B]</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnKes</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15369</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnKes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2003 22:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15369</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I don&#039;t think XM or Sirius work outside of the continental US.  For sure not Sirius.  I work at the company that built the Sirius satellites - its antennas were only designed to cover the US.

I think Alcatel is working on a European version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I don&#8217;t think XM or Sirius work outside of the continental US.  For sure not Sirius.  I work at the company that built the Sirius satellites &#8211; its antennas were only designed to cover the US.</p>
<p>I think Alcatel is working on a European version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mterk</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15368</link>
		<dc:creator>mterk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2003 21:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15368</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know if XM receives a signal in England?
-Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know if XM receives a signal in England?<br />
-Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15367</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2003 15:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15367</guid>
		<description>I wish my iPod had satellite radio built in! :wow:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish my iPod had satellite radio built in! :wow:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fitzsimmons</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15366</link>
		<dc:creator>fitzsimmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2003 04:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15366</guid>
		<description>By the way, in case anyone&#039;s interested, XM announced its current subscriber numbers today:

This quarter XM hit 692,253, an increase of 209,178 over the previous quarter.

That is an average increase of 2324.2 subscribers per day (or 69,723 / month).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, in case anyone&#8217;s interested, XM announced its current subscriber numbers today:</p>
<p>This quarter XM hit 692,253, an increase of 209,178 over the previous quarter.</p>
<p>That is an average increase of 2324.2 subscribers per day (or 69,723 / month).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fitzsimmons</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15365</link>
		<dc:creator>fitzsimmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2003 04:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15365</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m looking forward to the XM walkman, which was announced at the Q1 shareholders&#039; meeting earlier this year.   (I&#039;m getting awfully tired of lugging the SkyFi Boombox everywhere...)

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted by buffasnow1 &lt;/em&gt;
I spoke with a Sirius rep yesterday. He said that the new Audiovox line of satellite receivers will soon be marketing a product that allows the subscriber to carry music with them on their waists. I can&#039;t wait! &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to the XM walkman, which was announced at the Q1 shareholders&#8217; meeting earlier this year.   (I&#8217;m getting awfully tired of lugging the SkyFi Boombox everywhere&#8230;)</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Originally posted by buffasnow1 </em><br />
I spoke with a Sirius rep yesterday. He said that the new Audiovox line of satellite receivers will soon be marketing a product that allows the subscriber to carry music with them on their waists. I can&#8217;t wait! </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buffasnow1</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15364</link>
		<dc:creator>buffasnow1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 18:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15364</guid>
		<description>Hi Josh,

I don&#039;t know about XM radio, but the basic Sirius subscription includes a password that permits the user to stream music, via a computer with a high speed internet connection, at no additional charge. No fancy software is available or required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Josh,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about XM radio, but the basic Sirius subscription includes a password that permits the user to stream music, via a computer with a high speed internet connection, at no additional charge. No fancy software is available or required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnKes</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15363</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnKes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15363</guid>
		<description>I became convinced of satellite radio the first time I drove from San Jose to LA.  5 hours with a meager selection of country, western, spanish, plus a few christian stations.  [We forgot to bring our CDs.]  We were dyin&#039; by the time we came within range of LA stations!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I became convinced of satellite radio the first time I drove from San Jose to LA.  5 hours with a meager selection of country, western, spanish, plus a few christian stations.  [We forgot to bring our CDs.]  We were dyin&#8217; by the time we came within range of LA stations!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buffasnow1</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15362</link>
		<dc:creator>buffasnow1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15362</guid>
		<description>I spoke with a Sirius rep yesterday. He said that the new Audiovox line of satellite receivers will soon be marketing a product that allows the subscriber to carry music with them on their waists. I can&#039;t wait!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spoke with a Sirius rep yesterday. He said that the new Audiovox line of satellite receivers will soon be marketing a product that allows the subscriber to carry music with them on their waists. I can&#8217;t wait!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoshFink</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15361</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshFink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15361</guid>
		<description>Is it possible to bring this signal into one computer in the house and then stream it throughout the house to multiple computers?

Thanks

Josh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to bring this signal into one computer in the house and then stream it throughout the house to multiple computers?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosmo</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15360</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15360</guid>
		<description>If anyone out there misses their morning DJ insanity, there is channel 152.....nothing but that morning madness 24 hrs a day.

(One to skip for me too......)

As for paying for radio:  $10/month is like buying lunch at work 2 times.  I&#039;d gladly trade the food where I work (hospital) for the pure listening enjoyment anytime!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone out there misses their morning DJ insanity, there is channel 152&#8230;..nothing but that morning madness 24 hrs a day.</p>
<p>(One to skip for me too&#8230;&#8230;)</p>
<p>As for paying for radio:  $10/month is like buying lunch at work 2 times.  I&#8217;d gladly trade the food where I work (hospital) for the pure listening enjoyment anytime!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15359</link>
		<dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 05:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15359</guid>
		<description>flamaest, 

Do you have cable or satellite TV? I bet 25 years ago people would have scoffed at the idea of paying for TV broadcasts. Now, TV is almost worthless without the value enhanced cable channels - that you pay for.

I look at satellite radio the same way - but with a benefit. I pay for cable TV, but I still have to endure commercials on most channels. With satellite radio, I have the exact type of station I want to tune into without any commercials and without suffering through the painful &quot;morning DJ&quot; chit chat. 

I was skeptical about &quot;paying&quot; for radio, too - before I got Sirius. Now, I will have it in &lt;strong&gt;every&lt;/strong&gt; vehicle I ever own. It is worth the $13 a month for me.

BTW, there is a Weather Channel station for whatever part of the country you live in. No traffic congestion /GPS yet - maybe someday.

Judie :0)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flamaest, </p>
<p>Do you have cable or satellite TV? I bet 25 years ago people would have scoffed at the idea of paying for TV broadcasts. Now, TV is almost worthless without the value enhanced cable channels &#8211; that you pay for.</p>
<p>I look at satellite radio the same way &#8211; but with a benefit. I pay for cable TV, but I still have to endure commercials on most channels. With satellite radio, I have the exact type of station I want to tune into without any commercials and without suffering through the painful &#8220;morning DJ&#8221; chit chat. </p>
<p>I was skeptical about &#8220;paying&#8221; for radio, too &#8211; before I got Sirius. Now, I will have it in <strong>every</strong> vehicle I ever own. It is worth the $13 a month for me.</p>
<p>BTW, there is a Weather Channel station for whatever part of the country you live in. No traffic congestion /GPS yet &#8211; maybe someday.</p>
<p>Judie :0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flamaest</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15358</link>
		<dc:creator>flamaest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 01:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15358</guid>
		<description>I will never pay for radio. period.

I will however, pay for radio + GPS enabled intelligent traffic/weather maps to help me avoid traffic congestion and know what the weather is going to be like anywhere I go. 

Until XM adds this form of additional services, satellite radio is simply a waste of satellite bandwidth and technology.

F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will never pay for radio. period.</p>
<p>I will however, pay for radio + GPS enabled intelligent traffic/weather maps to help me avoid traffic congestion and know what the weather is going to be like anywhere I go. </p>
<p>Until XM adds this form of additional services, satellite radio is simply a waste of satellite bandwidth and technology.</p>
<p>F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reader</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15357</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15357</guid>
		<description>Damn right XMSR and SIRI stocks have been sky rocketing, but pulling back now.  SIRI is the money maker. Tip: buy on Wednesday, sell after 4th of July weekend.   Reason: many will be selling stock before 4th of july weekend to lower exposure of the 3 day holiday in which bad news can come out while they&#039;re on vacation.  It is a historical statistics that buying a few days before any majore holiday weekends will get you good gains.  I&#039;ll be back a week after 4th of jUly to tell you the results : ) hehe.

SIRI and IGCE looks like good targets for Wednesday Entry for me.

THIS IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THIS ARTICLE BECAUSE I SPECIFICALY TALKED ABOUT XM RADIO AND SIRUS NETWORK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn right XMSR and SIRI stocks have been sky rocketing, but pulling back now.  SIRI is the money maker. Tip: buy on Wednesday, sell after 4th of July weekend.   Reason: many will be selling stock before 4th of july weekend to lower exposure of the 3 day holiday in which bad news can come out while they&#8217;re on vacation.  It is a historical statistics that buying a few days before any majore holiday weekends will get you good gains.  I&#8217;ll be back a week after 4th of jUly to tell you the results : ) hehe.</p>
<p>SIRI and IGCE looks like good targets for Wednesday Entry for me.</p>
<p>THIS IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THIS ARTICLE BECAUSE I SPECIFICALY TALKED ABOUT XM RADIO AND SIRUS NETWORK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosmo</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15356</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2003 17:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15356</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m new to this board, so I&#039;ll keep my comments simple.  Satellite Raidio is great.  It gives me an opportunity to listen to new music,  and learn more about the artists.  XM 150 (comedy) makes the stop-and-go traffic of an obnoxious  commute not only bearable, but a breeze.  I hate being in a car without it.

I have the Delphi portable unit for home, and have it hooked into my PC already.  I&#039;ve been curious about the benefits of the XMPC version, and this review has answered some of my questions.  It also introduced me to Media Center; I&#039;ve been looking into a timer for XM recording, andf this one is the best I&#039;ve found.  The benefits of the PC version v what I have:

1.  Less cabling arounf the computer.  No need for an additional power source.

2.  Programming the recorder seems easier; I don&#039;t have to remember to turn on the separate XM box.

3.  Being able to just hit a button to remember the info on a song is worth it&#039;s weight in gold.  Again, I listen to a lot of new music, and really enjoy downloading it (I always try the Apple Store first on my iBook; if it&#039;s not available, off to Kazaa).  I cannot tell you how many times I&#039;ve scrambled for a scrap of paper, interrupting whatever I&#039;m doing.

I think the debate over sound quality is a moot point.  It&#039;s great, and I cannot tell the difference between a CD and the XM on my system.  It&#039;s WAY better than FM.  That is a fact.

Re: reception.  I live in an area where I do not get a constant signal while driving. (due to mountains).  Mother nature WAS here first.  I do get great sound at home, with partial (2-3) reception from the satellite, even thru trees.  

If you appreciate music, entertainment and nostalgia, satellite radio is for you.   This system for the PC seems well thought out; I may need to indulge.

Thanx for all the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m new to this board, so I&#8217;ll keep my comments simple.  Satellite Raidio is great.  It gives me an opportunity to listen to new music,  and learn more about the artists.  XM 150 (comedy) makes the stop-and-go traffic of an obnoxious  commute not only bearable, but a breeze.  I hate being in a car without it.</p>
<p>I have the Delphi portable unit for home, and have it hooked into my PC already.  I&#8217;ve been curious about the benefits of the XMPC version, and this review has answered some of my questions.  It also introduced me to Media Center; I&#8217;ve been looking into a timer for XM recording, andf this one is the best I&#8217;ve found.  The benefits of the PC version v what I have:</p>
<p>1.  Less cabling arounf the computer.  No need for an additional power source.</p>
<p>2.  Programming the recorder seems easier; I don&#8217;t have to remember to turn on the separate XM box.</p>
<p>3.  Being able to just hit a button to remember the info on a song is worth it&#8217;s weight in gold.  Again, I listen to a lot of new music, and really enjoy downloading it (I always try the Apple Store first on my iBook; if it&#8217;s not available, off to Kazaa).  I cannot tell you how many times I&#8217;ve scrambled for a scrap of paper, interrupting whatever I&#8217;m doing.</p>
<p>I think the debate over sound quality is a moot point.  It&#8217;s great, and I cannot tell the difference between a CD and the XM on my system.  It&#8217;s WAY better than FM.  That is a fact.</p>
<p>Re: reception.  I live in an area where I do not get a constant signal while driving. (due to mountains).  Mother nature WAS here first.  I do get great sound at home, with partial (2-3) reception from the satellite, even thru trees.  </p>
<p>If you appreciate music, entertainment and nostalgia, satellite radio is for you.   This system for the PC seems well thought out; I may need to indulge.</p>
<p>Thanx for all the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fitzsimmons</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15355</link>
		<dc:creator>fitzsimmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2003 02:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15355</guid>
		<description>This question has received a lot of debate on other forums.  Since XM doesn&#039;t use MP3 but rather something called CT-aacPlus, it&#039;s hard to make a clear comparison.  That being said, I think most people would agree XM sounds much better than a 128kb/s MP3 recording.  I&#039;d probably compare it to  160 - 192kb/s MP3, which are what I use on my IPod, but this is completely subjective and different music to different people will sound better or worse.  

For the matter at hand, I would just say that XM has high fidelity audio and leave it at that.

One of the cool features of XM and Sirius is that they can both supposedly download new codecs to devices as they are developed, so the music quality should only improve over time.  

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This question has received a lot of debate on other forums.  Since XM doesn&#8217;t use MP3 but rather something called CT-aacPlus, it&#8217;s hard to make a clear comparison.  That being said, I think most people would agree XM sounds much better than a 128kb/s MP3 recording.  I&#8217;d probably compare it to  160 &#8211; 192kb/s MP3, which are what I use on my IPod, but this is completely subjective and different music to different people will sound better or worse.  </p>
<p>For the matter at hand, I would just say that XM has high fidelity audio and leave it at that.</p>
<p>One of the cool features of XM and Sirius is that they can both supposedly download new codecs to devices as they are developed, so the music quality should only improve over time.  </p>
<p> <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redbike2001</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15354</link>
		<dc:creator>redbike2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2003 21:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15354</guid>
		<description>Perhaps then it would be better to say that both XM and Sirius sound quality is comparable to MP3 at 128khz?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps then it would be better to say that both XM and Sirius sound quality is comparable to MP3 at 128khz?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fitzsimmons</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15353</link>
		<dc:creator>fitzsimmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2003 21:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15353</guid>
		<description>Eric, I can see what causes confusion about this, so shame on their marketing department.  Strictly speaking, I suppose, anything &quot;is comparable to CD quality,&quot; it just might not compare very favorably.  Nonetheless, their marketing hype doesn&#039;t change the fact that XM does not by any stretch of the imagination provide what is known as Redbook CD Quality, due both to XM&#039;s lossy compression and its much lower sampling rate.  What they most have in common is they&#039;re both digital.  

The difference is actually much easier to hear than you might expect.  Try listening to almost any music that has trumpets, e.g., on one of the jazz, 40s or classical channels.  For whatever reason, XM&#039;s compression can distort trumpets horribly and it&#039;s painfully easy to hear when the signal is uncompressed.  I&#039;ve had friends who don&#039;t know the first thing about hifi audio or signal processing ask me what the hell is wrong with the music when that happens...

Anyway, I think that it is especially because XM&#039;s marketing department is misleading about this, it&#039;s important for reviewers to accurately call them on it.  Just for reference, Sirius has the same type of problems, as do most systems that use lossy compression schemes, such as MP3 players.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted by redbike2001 &lt;/em&gt;
[B]Fitz...for what it&#039;s worth to you, this is copied right from the FAQ page on the XM Radio site:

&quot;How good is the sound quality of XM PCR? 

The sound quality of the XM PCR is equal to any XM Radio model such as the Delphi SKYFi, and is comparable to CD quality.&quot;

[/B]&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, I can see what causes confusion about this, so shame on their marketing department.  Strictly speaking, I suppose, anything &#8220;is comparable to CD quality,&#8221; it just might not compare very favorably.  Nonetheless, their marketing hype doesn&#8217;t change the fact that XM does not by any stretch of the imagination provide what is known as Redbook CD Quality, due both to XM&#8217;s lossy compression and its much lower sampling rate.  What they most have in common is they&#8217;re both digital.  </p>
<p>The difference is actually much easier to hear than you might expect.  Try listening to almost any music that has trumpets, e.g., on one of the jazz, 40s or classical channels.  For whatever reason, XM&#8217;s compression can distort trumpets horribly and it&#8217;s painfully easy to hear when the signal is uncompressed.  I&#8217;ve had friends who don&#8217;t know the first thing about hifi audio or signal processing ask me what the hell is wrong with the music when that happens&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, I think that it is especially because XM&#8217;s marketing department is misleading about this, it&#8217;s important for reviewers to accurately call them on it.  Just for reference, Sirius has the same type of problems, as do most systems that use lossy compression schemes, such as MP3 players.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Originally posted by redbike2001 </em><br />
[B]Fitz&#8230;for what it&#8217;s worth to you, this is copied right from the FAQ page on the XM Radio site:</p>
<p>&#8220;How good is the sound quality of XM PCR? </p>
<p>The sound quality of the XM PCR is equal to any XM Radio model such as the Delphi SKYFi, and is comparable to CD quality.&#8221;</p>
<p>[/B]</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15352</link>
		<dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2003 21:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15352</guid>
		<description>Eric,

There is a little bit of degredation in speed, plus the sound quality isn&#039;t &lt;strong&gt;that&lt;/strong&gt; great and then there are the other usual problem you can encounter with streaming audi (reset streams, etc). But, if you are in the situation like Dreamer described, it might be a solution.

I just realized that buffasnow1 had mentioned the streaming audio previously. DOH. :o 

Judie :0)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>There is a little bit of degredation in speed, plus the sound quality isn&#8217;t <strong>that</strong> great and then there are the other usual problem you can encounter with streaming audi (reset streams, etc). But, if you are in the situation like Dreamer described, it might be a solution.</p>
<p>I just realized that buffasnow1 had mentioned the streaming audio previously. DOH. <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Judie :0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redbike2001</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15351</link>
		<dc:creator>redbike2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2003 21:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15351</guid>
		<description>Fitz...for what it&#039;s worth to you, this is copied right from the FAQ page on the XM Radio site:

&quot;How good is the sound quality of XM PCR? 

The sound quality of the XM PCR is equal to any XM Radio model such as the Delphi SKYFi, and is comparable to CD quality.&quot;

That&#039;s cool that Sirius offers the streaming option to its customers.  The only problem with streaming is that it takes up some portion of your bandwidth.  Do you notice any degradation in your Internet speeds?

Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fitz&#8230;for what it&#8217;s worth to you, this is copied right from the FAQ page on the XM Radio site:</p>
<p>&#8220;How good is the sound quality of XM PCR? </p>
<p>The sound quality of the XM PCR is equal to any XM Radio model such as the Delphi SKYFi, and is comparable to CD quality.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s cool that Sirius offers the streaming option to its customers.  The only problem with streaming is that it takes up some portion of your bandwidth.  Do you notice any degradation in your Internet speeds?</p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15350</link>
		<dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2003 19:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15350</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth...

I have a Sirius reciever in my truck. As a subscriber, I am also able to get streaming audio content on my PC. You can try it free at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sirius.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=Sirius/CachedPage&amp;c=Page&amp;cid=1018209032790&quot;&gt;http://www.sirius.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=Sirius/CachedPage&amp;c=Page&amp;cid=1018209032790&lt;/a&gt;.

Click &quot;Listen Now&quot; at the top of the page.

I am not sure if XM also offers something like this, but I bet they do.

Judie :0)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth&#8230;</p>
<p>I have a Sirius reciever in my truck. As a subscriber, I am also able to get streaming audio content on my PC. You can try it free at <a href="http://www.sirius.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=Sirius/CachedPage&#038;c=Page&#038;cid=1018209032790">http://www.sirius.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=Sirius/CachedPage&#038;c=Page&#038;cid=1018209032790</a>.</p>
<p>Click &#8220;Listen Now&#8221; at the top of the page.</p>
<p>I am not sure if XM also offers something like this, but I bet they do.</p>
<p>Judie :0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fitzsimmons</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/07/19/gem_hunter_for_pocket_pc_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15349</link>
		<dc:creator>fitzsimmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2003 19:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15349</guid>
		<description>Dreamer,

You can buy an XM radio and try it out without activating it.  Even radios that haven&#039;t been activated can receive a bunch of stations for free.   So, you can buy the radio and see if you get reception without the bother of activation (which is pretty trivial anyway).  If it doesn&#039;t work for you, just return the radio.

Fitz

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted by TheDreamer &lt;/em&gt;
[B]I&#039;ll admit that I&#039;ve been curious about XM radio for some time....but the question I haven&#039;t heard answered...is whether they work at all indoors.

Specifically, would it work from my cubicle at work.

It is the one place where I can&#039;t get radio....  I also barely get cellular....

I really don&#039;t want to buy it and then find out the answer is no....since I can&#039;t think of any other reason to justify having it otherwise.

The Dreamer [/B]&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dreamer,</p>
<p>You can buy an XM radio and try it out without activating it.  Even radios that haven&#8217;t been activated can receive a bunch of stations for free.   So, you can buy the radio and see if you get reception without the bother of activation (which is pretty trivial anyway).  If it doesn&#8217;t work for you, just return the radio.</p>
<p>Fitz</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Originally posted by TheDreamer </em><br />
[B]I&#8217;ll admit that I&#8217;ve been curious about XM radio for some time&#8230;.but the question I haven&#8217;t heard answered&#8230;is whether they work at all indoors.</p>
<p>Specifically, would it work from my cubicle at work.</p>
<p>It is the one place where I can&#8217;t get radio&#8230;.  I also barely get cellular&#8230;.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t want to buy it and then find out the answer is no&#8230;.since I can&#8217;t think of any other reason to justify having it otherwise.</p>
<p>The Dreamer [/B]</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

