<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lodis PDA Insert for 3 and 6 Ring Agendas Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/06/14/lodis_pda_insert_for_3_and_6_ring_agendas_review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/06/14/lodis_pda_insert_for_3_and_6_ring_agendas_review/</link>
	<description>Gadget reviews and news by Julie Strietelmeier and friends since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:31:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/06/14/lodis_pda_insert_for_3_and_6_ring_agendas_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15273</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15273</guid>
		<description>...and I was just thinking it really said something about ME! Behold the awesome power of the reviewer! :)

Seriously, I think that&#039;s great that they&#039;ve decided not to sell the case. Even if it is somehow leather, it certainly doesn&#039;t look or feel like it, and who wants to spend $20+ on a leather case that doesn&#039;t feel like leather? I doubt that my review of it had much to do with the decision to pull the case, but I would guess it was a decision based on customer feedback. That suggests that Surplus is quite responsive.

The case is still available for other PDAs though -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.surplus.com.hk/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=71&quot;&gt;this case&lt;/a&gt; is for the Sony S33, and it is exactly the same material and design.

As for the pics, I do apologize. My only working camera right now is a POS 1.3mp that doesn&#039;t have a flash and doesn&#039;t do macro very well (as you can see). If you want to see better pics of the material used, you&#039;ll have to go to the Surplus web site and check out the .&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.surplus.com.hk/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=71&quot;&gt;Sony case&lt;/a&gt; .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and I was just thinking it really said something about ME! Behold the awesome power of the reviewer! <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously, I think that&#8217;s great that they&#8217;ve decided not to sell the case. Even if it is somehow leather, it certainly doesn&#8217;t look or feel like it, and who wants to spend $20+ on a leather case that doesn&#8217;t feel like leather? I doubt that my review of it had much to do with the decision to pull the case, but I would guess it was a decision based on customer feedback. That suggests that Surplus is quite responsive.</p>
<p>The case is still available for other PDAs though &#8212; <a href="http://www.surplus.com.hk/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=71">this case</a> is for the Sony S33, and it is exactly the same material and design.</p>
<p>As for the pics, I do apologize. My only working camera right now is a POS 1.3mp that doesn&#8217;t have a flash and doesn&#8217;t do macro very well (as you can see). If you want to see better pics of the material used, you&#8217;ll have to go to the Surplus web site and check out the .<a href="http://www.surplus.com.hk/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=71">Sony case</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/06/14/lodis_pda_insert_for_3_and_6_ring_agendas_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15272</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15272</guid>
		<description>Actually, I just got an email from them. Here&#039;s what it said:

[B]
Hello Julie,

I&#039;m apologize let Nate &amp; you have a very poor experience from our H1910
case,

Acturally, The material is the 2nd layer of leather, All 2nd layer of leather will have a coating like plastic and use a module to embedded a pattern on it, So we still called this material named leather in HongKong, (I don&#039;t know the acutal name of this material in your country)

And I stopped the selling program for the H1910 case,
Because I just want to keep a good image for all reviewer &amp; a best goodwill for our customer and all visistor coming from your web site.

Thank you a lot!

Best regards,

Jonathan Sin
Director
Surplus.com.hk 
[/B]

I&#039;m very impressed that they would take the product offline due to Nate&#039;s review. That really says something about them. Hopefully they can fix the issues with this case and come out with a better one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I just got an email from them. Here&#8217;s what it said:</p>
<p>[B]<br />
Hello Julie,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m apologize let Nate &#038; you have a very poor experience from our H1910<br />
case,</p>
<p>Acturally, The material is the 2nd layer of leather, All 2nd layer of leather will have a coating like plastic and use a module to embedded a pattern on it, So we still called this material named leather in HongKong, (I don&#8217;t know the acutal name of this material in your country)</p>
<p>And I stopped the selling program for the H1910 case,<br />
Because I just want to keep a good image for all reviewer &#038; a best goodwill for our customer and all visistor coming from your web site.</p>
<p>Thank you a lot!</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Jonathan Sin<br />
Director<br />
Surplus.com.hk<br />
[/B]</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very impressed that they would take the product offline due to Nate&#8217;s review. That really says something about them. Hopefully they can fix the issues with this case and come out with a better one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dequardo</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/06/14/lodis_pda_insert_for_3_and_6_ring_agendas_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15271</link>
		<dc:creator>dequardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15271</guid>
		<description>HHmmmm.  Not even listed on the surplus site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HHmmmm.  Not even listed on the surplus site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/06/14/lodis_pda_insert_for_3_and_6_ring_agendas_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15270</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 02:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15270</guid>
		<description>The Reader:

First of all, the author of the review is a HE, not a SHE. 

Second of all, I agree that the images are not very good... But, the review itself is very informative and that is what matters most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Reader:</p>
<p>First of all, the author of the review is a HE, not a SHE. </p>
<p>Second of all, I agree that the images are not very good&#8230; But, the review itself is very informative and that is what matters most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reader</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/06/14/lodis_pda_insert_for_3_and_6_ring_agendas_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15269</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2003 23:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15269</guid>
		<description>What can I say, or what can YOU say, J&amp;J!!  Just check out those &quot;PHOTOS&quot;!!!  Did she use photoshop to do that??   No, she probably used one of your other recently reviewed webcams to take those!!  Sorry that your review didn&#039;t get thru to her enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can I say, or what can YOU say, J&#038;J!!  Just check out those &#8220;PHOTOS&#8221;!!!  Did she use photoshop to do that??   No, she probably used one of your other recently reviewed webcams to take those!!  Sorry that your review didn&#8217;t get thru to her enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2001/06/14/lodis_pda_insert_for_3_and_6_ring_agendas_review/comment-page-1/#comment-15268</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2003 22:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15268</guid>
		<description>Post your comments here on the Surplus PDA HP1910 Case Review.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/pdasurplus-hp1910-case-review.html&quot;&gt;http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/pdasurplus-hp1910-case-review.html&lt;/a&gt;

Just click the POST REPLY button on this page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post your comments here on the Surplus PDA HP1910 Case Review.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/pdasurplus-hp1910-case-review.html">http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/pdasurplus-hp1910-case-review.html</a></p>
<p>Just click the POST REPLY button on this page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
