<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QuickLink Pen Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/</link>
	<description>Gadget reviews and news by Julie Strietelmeier and friends since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:37:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: erniecookie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14125</link>
		<dc:creator>erniecookie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14125</guid>
		<description>Hi

I have this old dongle, mitsumi model WIF-0402C which I have lost the driver... I tried the web without success... would appreciate if you could point me where i can get this. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>I have this old dongle, mitsumi model WIF-0402C which I have lost the driver&#8230; I tried the web without success&#8230; would appreciate if you could point me where i can get this. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackrat</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14124</link>
		<dc:creator>blackrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2003 12:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14124</guid>
		<description>I read with interest your review of the Mitsumi USB Bluetooth dongle used to connect your Palm Tungsten T to the internet running on your computer. I have recently acquired a Tungsten and the Mitsumi dongle, and am trying to get to the point of being able to surf the net on my tt. (I must confess that I am a complete novice to Bluetooth technology, actually to Palm computing in general as this is my first handheld acquisition:)

I have installed the Mitsumi Bluetooth Suite and MochaPPP but cannot work out which COM port I need to enter to try and be able to sync, let alone connect to surf the net. Is this info displayed anywhere within the BT suite, and is it possible for the user to set the COM port number? I always get the message &quot;Error: Serial: timeout. Could be bad cable or faulty Modem. (0x0305)&quot; when trying to connect through prefs, network on my tt. The bluetooth is switched on as I&#039;m able to send a file from the tungsten to my PC with BT, but I&#039;ve not been able to hotsync with the PC via BT either.

I am running AOL as my ISP. Will this cause any problems when trying to surf on my tt, and will I need to change the procedure from what you have posted on your review of the Mitsumi dongle?

Any light you can shed on these problems will be much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read with interest your review of the Mitsumi USB Bluetooth dongle used to connect your Palm Tungsten T to the internet running on your computer. I have recently acquired a Tungsten and the Mitsumi dongle, and am trying to get to the point of being able to surf the net on my tt. (I must confess that I am a complete novice to Bluetooth technology, actually to Palm computing in general as this is my first handheld acquisition:)</p>
<p>I have installed the Mitsumi Bluetooth Suite and MochaPPP but cannot work out which COM port I need to enter to try and be able to sync, let alone connect to surf the net. Is this info displayed anywhere within the BT suite, and is it possible for the user to set the COM port number? I always get the message &#8220;Error: Serial: timeout. Could be bad cable or faulty Modem. (0&#215;0305)&#8221; when trying to connect through prefs, network on my tt. The bluetooth is switched on as I&#8217;m able to send a file from the tungsten to my PC with BT, but I&#8217;ve not been able to hotsync with the PC via BT either.</p>
<p>I am running AOL as my ISP. Will this cause any problems when trying to surf on my tt, and will I need to change the procedure from what you have posted on your review of the Mitsumi dongle?</p>
<p>Any light you can shed on these problems will be much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14123</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2003 23:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14123</guid>
		<description>I wonder how this adapter compares with the Palm version and the D-link version.


&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dlink.com/products/usb/dbt120/&quot;&gt;http://www.dlink.com/products/usb/dbt120/&lt;/a&gt;

Up to 725mbps doesn&#039;t list range.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://store.palm.com/product/index.jsp?productId=1248764&amp;cp=1254470.1254471&amp;parentPage=family&quot;&gt;http://store.palm.com/product/index.jsp?productId=1248764&amp;cp=1254470.1254471&amp;parentPage=family&lt;/a&gt;


The one Palm sells says a distance of 50 meters or 150 ft. That is pretty good. Also up to 1mbps.

Anybody know how these compare??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how this adapter compares with the Palm version and the D-link version.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dlink.com/products/usb/dbt120/">http://www.dlink.com/products/usb/dbt120/</a></p>
<p>Up to 725mbps doesn&#8217;t list range.</p>
<p><a href="http://store.palm.com/product/index.jsp?productId=1248764&#038;cp=1254470.1254471&#038;parentPage=family">http://store.palm.com/product/index.jsp?productId=1248764&#038;cp=1254470.1254471&#038;parentPage=family</a></p>
<p>The one Palm sells says a distance of 50 meters or 150 ft. That is pretty good. Also up to 1mbps.</p>
<p>Anybody know how these compare??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14122</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2003 04:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14122</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted by kstedman &lt;/em&gt;
[B]Got rid of my TT for the 5455.  Never looked back.

The Tungsten Files:

1) Slider loosened after 1 month.  Too many moving parts causes problems which is also why I avoided the NX Clie.
2)  Dust showed up.  Gadgeteers - throw an all black background and check that reflective screen for white particles.
3)  The Audio Patch was finally released....last week.  Unfortunately, so was the price drop to $399, the announcement that the Treos are discontinued with the Tungsten W on the shelf ready for shipment, Jot II and OS6 may not be compatable with the TT, and that the TT wasnt selling as well as everyone thought...and the beat goes on with Palm

I was always a heavy promoter of Palm OS devices..  I was extremely excited with the TT and I can honestly say it will probably be the last Palm OS unit that I ever own.  They have got to start listening to what people want and ship it.  Not wait until they complain and patch it.

They are beginning to cut corners and raise prices...these 2 dont mix. [/B]&lt;/blockquote&gt; 


Very interesting views. I did have alot of concerns for the TT slider but like the idea of built in bluetooth and the price drop. I found alot of my programs that I had as hacks wont make it to my OS 5 unit. 
   I am really have been researching what I want and have never played with a PPC for any amount of time. I had an ipaq for a week or so that was it. 
   I few of the things I would like to do is sync wirelessly and experiment with recieving email and surfing the internet in my house on my WIFI network.I know with this adaptor or the one Palm sells I could sync wirelessly via bluetooth but  don&#039;t know about surfing. Email is more important I guess then surfing I like the idea of a TT and a XT keyboard for email. 
  What scares me of PPC is  size, cost of programs and availibility, battery life, cost , compatibility.One thing I have been thinking about is the amount of PPC you see other there. I know two people with PPC and I know more then dozen with Palms.   I bought two magazines for researching my choices. Handheld Computing and Pocket PC.  
With Sonies new TG-50 with built in bluetooth and keyboard along with the new 3600 garmin  I don&#039;t know if now is the time to buy alot of new units coming by April. I guess you can always wait.The beat goes on!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Originally posted by kstedman </em><br />
[B]Got rid of my TT for the 5455.  Never looked back.</p>
<p>The Tungsten Files:</p>
<p>1) Slider loosened after 1 month.  Too many moving parts causes problems which is also why I avoided the NX Clie.<br />
2)  Dust showed up.  Gadgeteers &#8211; throw an all black background and check that reflective screen for white particles.<br />
3)  The Audio Patch was finally released&#8230;.last week.  Unfortunately, so was the price drop to $399, the announcement that the Treos are discontinued with the Tungsten W on the shelf ready for shipment, Jot II and OS6 may not be compatable with the TT, and that the TT wasnt selling as well as everyone thought&#8230;and the beat goes on with Palm</p>
<p>I was always a heavy promoter of Palm OS devices..  I was extremely excited with the TT and I can honestly say it will probably be the last Palm OS unit that I ever own.  They have got to start listening to what people want and ship it.  Not wait until they complain and patch it.</p>
<p>They are beginning to cut corners and raise prices&#8230;these 2 dont mix. [/B]</p></blockquote>
<p>Very interesting views. I did have alot of concerns for the TT slider but like the idea of built in bluetooth and the price drop. I found alot of my programs that I had as hacks wont make it to my OS 5 unit.<br />
   I am really have been researching what I want and have never played with a PPC for any amount of time. I had an ipaq for a week or so that was it.<br />
   I few of the things I would like to do is sync wirelessly and experiment with recieving email and surfing the internet in my house on my WIFI network.I know with this adaptor or the one Palm sells I could sync wirelessly via bluetooth but  don&#8217;t know about surfing. Email is more important I guess then surfing I like the idea of a TT and a XT keyboard for email.<br />
  What scares me of PPC is  size, cost of programs and availibility, battery life, cost , compatibility.One thing I have been thinking about is the amount of PPC you see other there. I know two people with PPC and I know more then dozen with Palms.   I bought two magazines for researching my choices. Handheld Computing and Pocket PC.<br />
With Sonies new TG-50 with built in bluetooth and keyboard along with the new 3600 garmin  I don&#8217;t know if now is the time to buy alot of new units coming by April. I guess you can always wait.The beat goes on!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kstedman</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14121</link>
		<dc:creator>kstedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2003 18:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14121</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted by Judie &lt;/em&gt;
[B]Matt,

I am growing slightly happier with my 5455, but the TT is still my main PDA. 

To the best of my knowledge, no patches have yet been released...

Judie :0) [/B]&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Got rid of my TT for the 5455.  Never looked back.

The Tungsten Files:

1) Slider loosened after 1 month.  Too many moving parts causes problems which is also why I avoided the NX Clie.
2)  Dust showed up.  Gadgeteers - throw an all black background and check that reflective screen for white particles.
3)  The Audio Patch was finally released....last week.  Unfortunately, so was the price drop to $399, the announcement that the Treos are discontinued with the Tungsten W on the shelf ready for shipment, Jot II and OS6 may not be compatable with the TT, and that the TT wasnt selling as well as everyone thought...and the beat goes on with Palm

I was always a heavy promoter of Palm OS devices..  I was extremely excited with the TT and I can honestly say it will probably be the last Palm OS unit that I ever own.  They have got to start listening to what people want and ship it.  Not wait until they complain and patch it.

They are beginning to cut corners and raise prices...these 2 dont mix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Originally posted by Judie </em><br />
[B]Matt,</p>
<p>I am growing slightly happier with my 5455, but the TT is still my main PDA. </p>
<p>To the best of my knowledge, no patches have yet been released&#8230;</p>
<p>Judie :0) [/B]</p></blockquote>
<p>Got rid of my TT for the 5455.  Never looked back.</p>
<p>The Tungsten Files:</p>
<p>1) Slider loosened after 1 month.  Too many moving parts causes problems which is also why I avoided the NX Clie.<br />
2)  Dust showed up.  Gadgeteers &#8211; throw an all black background and check that reflective screen for white particles.<br />
3)  The Audio Patch was finally released&#8230;.last week.  Unfortunately, so was the price drop to $399, the announcement that the Treos are discontinued with the Tungsten W on the shelf ready for shipment, Jot II and OS6 may not be compatable with the TT, and that the TT wasnt selling as well as everyone thought&#8230;and the beat goes on with Palm</p>
<p>I was always a heavy promoter of Palm OS devices..  I was extremely excited with the TT and I can honestly say it will probably be the last Palm OS unit that I ever own.  They have got to start listening to what people want and ship it.  Not wait until they complain and patch it.</p>
<p>They are beginning to cut corners and raise prices&#8230;these 2 dont mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kstedman</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14120</link>
		<dc:creator>kstedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2003 18:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14120</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted by Julie &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;I couldn&#039;t get Bluetooth to work on the 5455 when I had one. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Thats suprising.  I found the Bluetooth Manager on the 5455 to be much more user friendly than the TT.  Granted, the Tungsten shipped with phone drivers which helps but I like the PPC version better.

For those that are wondering, if your PC has a bluetooth adapter and a DSL connection to the internet and own a 5455:

Open Bluetooth manager and set up active sync via Bluetooth.

After you set it up an activate the Bluetooth Active sync, open up IE on the PPC and start surfing.  It was that simple.

This is much easier than the setup with the tunsten.  In addtion, I have not dropped any connections unlike my connections with Mocha ppp with the Tungsten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Originally posted by Julie </em><br />
<strong>I couldn&#8217;t get Bluetooth to work on the 5455 when I had one. </strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Thats suprising.  I found the Bluetooth Manager on the 5455 to be much more user friendly than the TT.  Granted, the Tungsten shipped with phone drivers which helps but I like the PPC version better.</p>
<p>For those that are wondering, if your PC has a bluetooth adapter and a DSL connection to the internet and own a 5455:</p>
<p>Open Bluetooth manager and set up active sync via Bluetooth.</p>
<p>After you set it up an activate the Bluetooth Active sync, open up IE on the PPC and start surfing.  It was that simple.</p>
<p>This is much easier than the setup with the tunsten.  In addtion, I have not dropped any connections unlike my connections with Mocha ppp with the Tungsten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14119</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2003 04:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14119</guid>
		<description>You did end up sending it in to HP to get everything fixed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did end up sending it in to HP to get everything fixed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14118</link>
		<dc:creator>Judie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2003 04:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14118</guid>
		<description>Matt,

I am growing slightly happier with my 5455, but the TT is still my main PDA. 

To the best of my knowledge, no patches have yet been released...

Judie :0)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>I am growing slightly happier with my 5455, but the TT is still my main PDA. </p>
<p>To the best of my knowledge, no patches have yet been released&#8230;</p>
<p>Judie :0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14117</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2003 04:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14117</guid>
		<description>Has  Judie had good luck with her 5455 since she decided to keep it? Did HP release a patch of some sort to fix the problems you had Julie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has  Judie had good luck with her 5455 since she decided to keep it? Did HP release a patch of some sort to fix the problems you had Julie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14116</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2003 04:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14116</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t get Bluetooth to work on the 5455 when I had one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t get Bluetooth to work on the 5455 when I had one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14115</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2003 03:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14115</guid>
		<description>Your saying the 5455  WIFI connection was quicker then the TT bluetooth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your saying the 5455  WIFI connection was quicker then the TT bluetooth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kstedman</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14114</link>
		<dc:creator>kstedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2003 01:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14114</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted by Julie &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;In some instances surfing webpages via Bluetooth on my TT was faster than surfing the same webpages on the iPAQ 5455 using WiFi. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Have you compared the 5455 bluetooth connection?  Its faster than the TT cause Ive tried both.  At least from what I have seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Originally posted by Julie </em><br />
<strong>In some instances surfing webpages via Bluetooth on my TT was faster than surfing the same webpages on the iPAQ 5455 using WiFi. </strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Have you compared the 5455 bluetooth connection?  Its faster than the TT cause Ive tried both.  At least from what I have seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14113</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2003 18:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14113</guid>
		<description>Now with a PPC and a WIFI setup can I do everthing on internet explorer like I can now on my desktop? Does the email program and browser look the same as XP?  
   I know Palm used web clipping for a time for internet access, this is no long true with the software on the CD for the TT?:confused:
 I am not stuck on having the TT either, I don&#039;t know the abilities of the other Palms to access WIFI. 

Now with a Tungsten W i could in theory receive an alarm as email comes in correct? I would have to subscribe to ATT service tho. Do the TT and TW need some kind of sled for WIFI?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now with a PPC and a WIFI setup can I do everthing on internet explorer like I can now on my desktop? Does the email program and browser look the same as XP?<br />
   I know Palm used web clipping for a time for internet access, this is no long true with the software on the CD for the TT?:confused:<br />
 I am not stuck on having the TT either, I don&#8217;t know the abilities of the other Palms to access WIFI. </p>
<p>Now with a Tungsten W i could in theory receive an alarm as email comes in correct? I would have to subscribe to ATT service tho. Do the TT and TW need some kind of sled for WIFI?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14112</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2003 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14112</guid>
		<description>The Tungsten comes with a browser on the CD which is actually pretty good. 

If you know you&#039;re going to be surfing a lot with your PDA, I would go for a Pocket PC with WiFi because of the bigger screen and greater range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tungsten comes with a browser on the CD which is actually pretty good. </p>
<p>If you know you&#8217;re going to be surfing a lot with your PDA, I would go for a Pocket PC with WiFi because of the bigger screen and greater range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14111</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2003 14:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14111</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it easier to surf with the PPC being it has internet explorer on it. 
Don&#039;t you have to add a third party browser to the Palm platform to surf and check emails?
   I am toying with the idea of internet and email with my next pda.  Not sure what would be faster and easier to use a TT with an addition of a bluetooth adaptor to my laptop or a PPC with built in WIFI.  I would think the signal from WIFI then converting to bluetooth would really slow down. Anybody know?? 
    I also want to be able to connect from a remote location with a phone line type of modem so I can dial into my ISP. Any ideas the best units out there for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it easier to surf with the PPC being it has internet explorer on it.<br />
Don&#8217;t you have to add a third party browser to the Palm platform to surf and check emails?<br />
   I am toying with the idea of internet and email with my next pda.  Not sure what would be faster and easier to use a TT with an addition of a bluetooth adaptor to my laptop or a PPC with built in WIFI.  I would think the signal from WIFI then converting to bluetooth would really slow down. Anybody know??<br />
    I also want to be able to connect from a remote location with a phone line type of modem so I can dial into my ISP. Any ideas the best units out there for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14110</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2003 14:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14110</guid>
		<description>In some instances surfing webpages via Bluetooth on my TT was faster than surfing the same webpages on the iPAQ 5455 using WiFi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some instances surfing webpages via Bluetooth on my TT was faster than surfing the same webpages on the iPAQ 5455 using WiFi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14109</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2003 04:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14109</guid>
		<description>your saying your bluetooth on the TT is faster then the PPC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your saying your bluetooth on the TT is faster then the PPC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14108</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2003 02:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14108</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very possible. Another factor might be my satellite system. There is a latency issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very possible. Another factor might be my satellite system. There is a latency issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kstedman</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14107</link>
		<dc:creator>kstedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2003 02:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14107</guid>
		<description>Im actually posting these comments with a Bluetooth connection to my PC with an Ipaq 5455.  I use a Belkin BT Adapter and have DSL.

I opened the links that you posted and the pages opened up in about 1/2 the speed of the TT.  Is it possible that the ppp connection is slowing it down somehow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im actually posting these comments with a Bluetooth connection to my PC with an Ipaq 5455.  I use a Belkin BT Adapter and have DSL.</p>
<p>I opened the links that you posted and the pages opened up in about 1/2 the speed of the TT.  Is it possible that the ppp connection is slowing it down somehow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14106</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2003 03:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14106</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted by Julie &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Yes :) &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

I think we both got it now Julie, hehe:wow:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Originally posted by Julie </em><br />
<strong>Yes <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </strong></p></blockquote>
<p>I think we both got it now Julie, hehe:wow:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14105</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2003 03:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14105</guid>
		<description>Yes :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14104</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2003 02:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14104</guid>
		<description>Ok, 
   So you could install the software once on both of my computers then turn on the bluetooth and basicly plug and play.

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok,<br />
   So you could install the software once on both of my computers then turn on the bluetooth and basicly plug and play.</p>
<p> <img src='http://the-gadgeteer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14103</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2003 01:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14103</guid>
		<description>You just have to make sure the Bluetooth suite is running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just have to make sure the Bluetooth suite is running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14102</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2003 22:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14102</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally posted by _Q_ &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;I [B]think&lt;/strong&gt; what Matt&#039;s asking is this:  after you install it the first time, if you can disconnect and reconnect it without changing any settings.  In other words, if you have to disconnect it to use some other USB device, can you then reconnect it as is or do you need to reenable anything?

One of those &quot;no obvious reason why not but good to be sure&quot; type of questions...

Matt, please tell me if I&#039;m way off base (or on track) here... [/B]&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

That is exactly what I am saying. 
    thanks:wow:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Originally posted by _Q_ </em><br />
<strong>I [B]think</strong> what Matt&#8217;s asking is this:  after you install it the first time, if you can disconnect and reconnect it without changing any settings.  In other words, if you have to disconnect it to use some other USB device, can you then reconnect it as is or do you need to reenable anything?</p>
<p>One of those &#8220;no obvious reason why not but good to be sure&#8221; type of questions&#8230;</p>
<p>Matt, please tell me if I&#8217;m way off base (or on track) here&#8230; [/B]</p></blockquote>
<p>That is exactly what I am saying.<br />
    thanks:wow:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: _Q_</title>
		<link>http://the-gadgeteer.com/2000/05/14/quicklink_pen_review/comment-page-1/#comment-14101</link>
		<dc:creator>_Q_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2003 20:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14101</guid>
		<description>I &lt;strong&gt;think&lt;/strong&gt; what Matt&#039;s asking is this:  after you install it the first time, if you can disconnect and reconnect it without changing any settings.  In other words, if you have to disconnect it to use some other USB device, can you then reconnect it as is or do you need to reenable anything?

One of those &quot;no obvious reason why not but good to be sure&quot; type of questions...

Matt, please tell me if I&#039;m way off base (or on track) here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <strong>think</strong> what Matt&#8217;s asking is this:  after you install it the first time, if you can disconnect and reconnect it without changing any settings.  In other words, if you have to disconnect it to use some other USB device, can you then reconnect it as is or do you need to reenable anything?</p>
<p>One of those &#8220;no obvious reason why not but good to be sure&#8221; type of questions&#8230;</p>
<p>Matt, please tell me if I&#8217;m way off base (or on track) here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

